Author:
Ghasemi Ali,Naeimaeyi aali Mahdi
Abstract
Context: Artificial intelligence refers to a set of systems that are capable of performing functions similar to human intelligent functions. Today, artificial intelligence has been successfully incorporated into clinical decision support systems (CDSS). Evidence Acquisition: The current study aimed to briefly present a narrative mini-review on clinical reasoning and artificial intelligence. Data were gathered from Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and PubMed databases using the "clinical decision support system, artificial intelligence, and clinical reasoning" keywords. Results: Clinical decision support systems are divided into two categories: Knowledge-based and data-driven. The first category is called the rule-based expert system, and the second category is also named the machine-learning system. The usefulness of the mentioned systems and artificial intelligence in interpreting algorithmic and statistical information, where the human element can easily make a mistake, is that they are much more efficient and work with fewer errors. However, when it comes to dealing with a patient and his complaints and symptoms, because of the requirement for clinical judgment, the human element works much better in obtaining a mental image of the patient’s condition. Artificial intelligence is specifically used in scenarios such as the diagnosis of electrolyte disorders, interpreting ECG findings, and recognizing the causes of myocardial hypertrophy. Nonetheless, artificial intelligence has challenges, such as a lack of responsibility for medical decisions and treatment errors. Conclusions: Referring to the above-mentioned benefits and challenges of artificial intelligence, artificial and human intelligence cannot be superior to each other, and both have an irreplaceable role in clinical decision-making. The new view is that the goal of CDSS is to help the physician make better decisions by processing vast pieces of information as a whole entity rather than individually.