Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Decision Support: Challenges for Evaluating AI and Practical Implications

Author:

Magrabi Farah1,Ammenwerth Elske2,McNair Jytte Brender3,De Keizer Nicolet F.4,Hyppönen Hannele5,Nykänen Pirkko6,Rigby Michael7,Scott Philip J.8,Vehko Tuulikki5,Wong Zoie Shui-Yee9,Georgiou Andrew1

Affiliation:

1. Macquarie University, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Sydney, Australia

2. UMIT, University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Institute of Medical Informatics, Hall in Tyrol, Austria

3. Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

4. Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, The Netherlands

5. National Institute for Health and Welfare, Information Department, Helsinki, Finland

6. Tampere University, Faculty for Information Technology and Communication Sciences, Tampere, Finland

7. Keele University, School of Social Science and Public Policy, Keele, United Kingdom

8. University of Portsmouth, Centre for Healthcare Modelling and Informatics, Portsmouth, United Kingdom

9. St. Luke’s International University, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

Objectives: This paper draws attention to: i) key considerations for evaluating artificial intelligence (AI) enabled clinical decision support; and ii) challenges and practical implications of AI design, development, selection, use, and ongoing surveillance. Method: A narrative review of existing research and evaluation approaches along with expert perspectives drawn from the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Working Group on Technology Assessment and Quality Development in Health Informatics and the European Federation for Medical Informatics (EFMI) Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems. Results: There is a rich history and tradition of evaluating AI in healthcare. While evaluators can learn from past efforts, and build on best practice evaluation frameworks and methodologies, questions remain about how to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of AI that dynamically harness vast amounts of genomic, biomarker, phenotype, electronic record, and care delivery data from across health systems. This paper first provides a historical perspective about the evaluation of AI in healthcare. It then examines key challenges of evaluating AI-enabled clinical decision support during design, development, selection, use, and ongoing surveillance. Practical aspects of evaluating AI in healthcare, including approaches to evaluation and indicators to monitor AI are also discussed. Conclusion: Commitment to rigorous initial and ongoing evaluation will be critical to ensuring the safe and effective integration of AI in complex sociotechnical settings. Specific enhancements that are required for the new generation of AI-enabled clinical decision support will emerge through practical application.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3