Affiliation:
1. Lexia Learning, Concord, MA, United States
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between English language
proficiency outcomes and the use of a Computer-Assisted Language Learning
(CALL) tool that is designed to strengthen the academic English and oral
proficiency skills of young English Learners (ELs). We compare scores on a
standardized English language proficiency assessment for 2,034 ELs from
kindergarten through Grade 5 in the US who either used the CALL tool during
the 2020-2021 academic school year (n=1,478) or did not (n=556). Descriptive
analyses show larger scores for students who used the program than those who
did not, and this was seen across student demographic subgroups. Statistical
analyses reveal that this difference is significant even when accounting for
student demographics and enrolled school and that greater program use is
related to higher proficiency scores. The largest effects are seen for oral
proficiency scores. The study raises implications for use of CALL tools in
contexts where English is the language of education.
Reference10 articles.
1. Testing a Research-Based Digital Learning Tool : Chinese EFL Children’s Linguistic Development
2. Bibauw, S., François, T., Van den Noortgate, W., & Desmet, P. (2022). Dialogue systems for language learning: a meta-analysis. Language Learning & Technology, 26(1), 1-25.
3. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamom.
4. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). Academic Press.
5. Spotlight on “Long-Term English Language Learners”: Characteristics and Prior Schooling Experiences of an Invisible Population