Survey of Rejection Prophylaxis Following Suture Removal in Penetrating Keratoplasty in Germany

Author:

Heinzelmann Sonja1,Böhringer Daniel1,Maier Philip Christian1,Seitz Berthold2ORCID,Cursiefen Claus3,Maier Anna-Karina B.4,Dietrich-Ntoukas Tina4,Geerling Gerd5,Viestenz Arne6,Pfeiffer Norbert7,Reinhard Thomas1

Affiliation:

1. Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Deutschland

2. Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes UKS, Homburg (Saar), Deutschland

3. Zentrum für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Deutschland

4. Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany

5. Augenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Deutschland

6. Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Augenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Deutschland

7. Augenklinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Deutschland

Abstract

Abstract Background Penetrating keratoplasty (PK) gets more and more reserved to cases of increasing complexity. In such cases, ocular comorbidities may limit graft survival following PK. A major cause for graft failure is endothelial graft rejection. Suture removal is a known risk factor for graft rejection. Nevertheless, there is no evidence-based regimen for rejection prophylaxis following suture removal. Therefore, a survey of rejection prophylaxis was conducted at 7 German keratoplasty centres. Objective The aim of the study was documentation of the variability of medicinal aftercare following suture removal in Germany. Methods Seven German keratoplasty centres with the highest numbers for PK were selected. The centres were sent a survey consisting of half-open questions. The centres performed a mean of 140 PK in 2018. The return rate was 100%. The findings were tabulated. Results All centres perform a double-running cross-stitch suture for standard PK, as well as a treatment for rejection prophylaxis with topical steroids after suture removal. There are differences in intensity (1 – 5 times daily) and tapering (2 – 20 weeks) of the topical steroids following suture removal. Two centres additionally use systemic steroids for a few days. Discussion Rejection prophylaxis following PK is currently poorly standardised and not evidence-based. All included centres perform medical aftercare following suture removal. It is assumed that different treatment strategies show different cost-benefit ratios. In the face of the diversity, a systematic analysis is required to develop an optimised regimen for all patients.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Ophthalmology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3