A Multiyear Survey Evaluating Clinician Electronic Health Record Satisfaction

Author:

Garabedian Pamela M.1,Rui Angela2,Volk Lynn A.1,Neville Bridget A.2,Lipsitz Stuart R.23,Healey Michael J.24,Bates David W.245

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Quality and IS Analysis, Mass General Brigham, Inc., Somerville, Massachusetts, United States

2. Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

3. Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Ariadne Labs, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

4. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

5. Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

Abstract Objectives We assessed how clinician satisfaction with a vendor electronic health record (EHR) changed over time in the 4 years following the transition from a homegrown EHR system to identify areas for improvement. Methods We conducted a multiyear survey of clinicians across a large health care system after transitioning to a vendor EHR. Eligible clinicians from the first institution to transition received a survey invitation by email in fall 2016 and then eligible clinicians systemwide received surveys in spring 2018 and spring 2019. The survey included items assessing ease/difficulty of completing tasks and items assessing perceptions of the EHR's value, usability, and impact. One item assessing overall satisfaction and one open-ended question were included. Frequencies and means were calculated, and comparison of means was performed between 2018 and 2019 on all clinicians. A multivariable generalized linear model was performed to predict the outcome of overall satisfaction. Results Response rates for the surveys ranged from 14 to 19%. The mean response from 3 years of surveys for one institution, Brigham and Women's Hospital, increased for overall satisfaction between 2016 (2.85), 2018 (3.01), and 2019 (3.21, p < 0.001). We found no significant differences in mean response for overall satisfaction between all responders of the 2018 survey (3.14) and those of the 2019 survey (3.19). Systemwide, tasks rated the most difficult included “Monitoring patient medication adherence,” “Identifying when a referral has not been completed,” and “Making a list of patients based on clinical information (e.g., problem, medication).” Clinicians disagreed the most with “The EHR helps me focus on patient care rather than the computer” and “The EHR allows me to complete tasks efficiently.” Conclusion Survey results indicate room for improvement in clinician satisfaction with the EHR. Usability of EHRs should continue to be an area of focus to ease clinician burden and improve clinician experience.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Health Information Management,Computer Science Applications,Health Informatics

Reference42 articles.

1. Electronic health records improve clinical note quality;H B Burke;J Am Med Inform Assoc,2015

2. Improving the electronic health record–are clinicians getting what they wished for?;J J Cimino;JAMA,2013

3. Electronic health records: then, now, and in the future;R S Evans;Yearb Med Inform,2016

4. The use of an electronic health record system reduces errors in the National Hip Fracture Database;J E Lawrence;Age Ageing,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3