Assessing Clinician Experience: Contributions from Human Factors

Author:

Herout Jennifer1,Maddox Kyle1,Neville Kelly J.2,Patterson Emily S.3,Perry Shawna J.4,Roth Emilie M.5

Affiliation:

1. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, USA

2. The MITRE Corporation, Bedford, MA, USA

3. The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

4. University of Florida Jacksonville, USA

5. Roth Cognitive Engineering, Stanford, CA, USA

Abstract

Evidence points to the critical importance of creating a positive clinical experience to maintain a well-functioning healthcare system. Despite its importance, there is little guidance on how to assess clinical user experience. While there does not yet appear to be consensus on critical domains of clinical experience, most components that appear in the literature or as categories in proprietary descriptions include areas in which human factors can and should have an impact. Panelists will discuss their experiences with various approaches to assessing clinical user experience and associated advantages and disadvantages. Specific approaches discussed include how technical and system data can be triangulated with other data, use of MITRE’s Resilience-Aware Development structured observation form (RAD-O), application of various survey strategies, and application of a work-centered approach to evaluation. A clinician also brings the perspective of the impact of using multiple electronic health records simultaneously on user experience.

Funder

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Clinical Informatics & Data Management Office, now called Clinical Informatics

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference26 articles.

1. Development and Validation of the System Trustworthiness Scale

2. Bateman T., Hobaugh S., Pridgen E., Reddy A. (2021). US healthcare labor market. https://www.mercer.com/content/dam/mercer/assets/content-images/north-america/united-states/us-healthcare-news/us-2021-healthcare-labor-market-whitepaper.pdf

3. A Human-Centered Evaluation of a Deep Learning System Deployed in Clinics for the Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy

4. Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges

5. Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3