Duodenoscope-associated infection prevention: A call for evidence-based decision making

Author:

Ofstead Cori L.1,Buro Brandy L.1,Hopkins Krystina M.1,Eiland John E.1,Wetzler Harry P.1,Lichtenstein David R.2

Affiliation:

1. Ofstead & Associates, Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota, United States

2. Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Abstract

Abstract Background Recent outbreaks of duodenoscope-associated multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) have brought attention to the infection risk from procedures performed with duodenoscopes. Prior to these MDRO outbreaks, procedures with duodenoscopes were considered safe and low risk for exogenous infection transmission, provided they were performed in strict accordance with manufacturer instructions for use and multisociety reprocessing guidelines. The attention and efforts of the scientific community, regulatory agencies, and the device industry have deepened our understanding of factors responsible for suboptimal outcomes. These include instrument design, reprocessing practices, and surveillance strategies for detecting patient and instrument colonization. Various investigations have made it clear that current reprocessing methods fail to consistently deliver a pathogen-free instrument. The magnitude of infection transmission has been underreported due to several factors. These include the types of organisms responsible for infection, clinical signs presenting in sites distant from ERCP inoculation, and long latency from the time of acquisition to infection. Healthcare providers remain hampered by the ill-defined infectious risk innate to the current instrument design, contradictory information and guidance, and limited evidence-based interventions or reprocessing modifications that reduce risk. Therefore, the objectives of this narrative review included identifying outbreaks described in the peer-reviewed literature and comparing the findings with infections reported elsewhere. Search strategies included accessing peer-reviewed articles, governmental databases, abstracts for scientific conferences, and media reports describing outbreaks. This review summarizes current knowledge, highlights gaps in traditional sources of evidence, and explores opportunities to improve our understanding of actual risk and evidence-based approaches to mitigate risk.

Publisher

Georg Thieme Verlag KG

Subject

Gastroenterology,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference71 articles.

1. ASGE Technology Assessment position paper: transmission of infection by gastrointestinal endoscopy;M B Kimmery;Gastrointest Endosc,1993

2. Infection control during GI endoscopy;ASGE Standards of Practice Committee;Gastrointest Endosc,2008

3. Multisociety guideline on reprocessing flexible GI endoscopes: 2011;B T Petersen;Infect Cont Hosp Epidemiol,2011

4. SGNA Standards: standards of infection control in reprocessing of flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes;Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates;Gastroenterol Nurs,2010

5. Transmission of infection by gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy;D H Spach;Ann Intern Med,1993

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3