Feedback literacy as a model to explore how learners respond to feedback

Author:

Spooner Muirne1,Pawlikowska Teresa1

Affiliation:

1. Health Professions Education Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland

Abstract

Clinicians spend a considerable part of their time while supervising trainees providing feedback. It is generally accepted that feedback can play a major role in subsequent academic performance. Traditionally it was thought that all feedback was good feedback, that inevitably improved learner outcomes. This has been challenged and it is now understood that feedback can have a beneficial or deleterious effect on the student. A number of factors can affect a learner's response to feedback. The concept of feedback literacy is helpful to understanding these responses – this describes the processes by which a learner makes sense of feedback and subsequently uses it to enhance learning. A learner who is feedback literate can recognise when they are getting feedback and understand how it relates to their progress; they can process it effectively both cognitively and emotionally, and they can put it in to action in ways which benefit their learning. Modifiable and non-modifiable factors can influence feedback literacy, with modifiable factors including feedback standards and supervisor behaviours. Providing clear feedback expectations, ensuring accuracy of feedback messages and focusing on the relationship between the teacher and learner have the most evidence for their effect on facilitating feedback literacy.

Publisher

Mark Allen Group

Subject

General Medicine

Reference42 articles.

1. State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback

2. Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design

3. Assessing Student Learning in Higher Education

4. Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis

5. Canadian Residency Accreditation Consortium. General standards of accreditation for residency programs. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Residency Accreditation Consortium; 2020

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3