Survey of satisfaction regarding palliative care provided to patients who died at home or in a hospital

Author:

Katsuki Masaaki1,Nakamata Momoka2,Ezaki Arisa2,Yamanaka Sayaka2,Imamura Sakiko2,Honda Chika2,Kubota Toshio3,Moriuchi Hiroshi3,Irikura Mitsuru4

Affiliation:

1. Lecturer in Pharmacy, Centre of Pharmaceutical Care for Community Health, Daiichi University of Pharmacy, Japan

2. Pharmacist, Laboratory of Evidence-Based Pharmacotherapy, Daiichi University of Pharmacy, Japan

3. Professor of Pharmacy, Centre of Pharmaceutical Care for Community Health, Daiichi University of Pharmacy, Japan

4. Professor of Pharmacy, Laboratory of Evidence-Based Pharmacotherapy, Daiichi University of Pharmacy, Japan

Abstract

Background: Improvement in quality of life (QoL) of patients is one of the most important goals of palliative care, but evaluation of QoL of patients is difficult. Aim: To evaluate QoL of patients who died at home or in a hospital. Methods: We administered the Good Death Inventory (10 core and 8 optional domains) to the bereaved families of patients who died at home or in a hospital. A total of 107 bereaved families undertook a survey. Findings: If a bereaved family chose ‘somewhat agree’, ‘agree’ or ‘absolutely agree’, the answer was regarded as a ‘satisfactory answer’. Regarding the 10 core domains, of patients who died in a hospital, <50% respondents gave a ‘satisfactory answer’ to three questions, whereas of patients who died at home, >60% of respondents gave a ‘satisfactory answer’ to seven questions. Regarding the eight optional domains, of patients who died in a hospital, <50% respondents gave a ‘satisfactory answer’ to five questions, whereas of patients who died at home, >60% of respondents gave a ‘satisfactory answer’ to four questions. Conclusions: QoL of patients who died at home appeared higher than that of those who died in a hospital. Patients prefer to remain at home rather than in a hospital, probably because at home they are surrounded by familiar things and can live according to their usual habits.

Publisher

Mark Allen Group

Subject

Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3