Assessing quality of care for the dying from the bereaved relatives’ perspective: Using pre-testing survey methods across seven countries to develop an international outcome measure

Author:

Mayland Catriona Rachel12ORCID,Gerlach Christina3ORCID,Sigurdardottir Katrin45ORCID,Hansen Marit Irene Tuen6,Leppert Wojciech78,Stachowiak Andrzej9,Krajewska Maria9,Garcia-Yanneo Eduardo10,Tripodoro Vilma Adriana1112,Goldraij Gabriel13,Weber Martin3,Zambon Lair14,Passarini Juliana Nalin15,Saad Ivete Bredda15,Ellershaw John116,Haugen Dagny Faksvåg46

Affiliation:

1. Palliative Care Institute, Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

2. Department of Oncology & Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

3. Interdisciplinary Palliative Care Unit, Department of Medicine, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany

4. Regional Centre of Excellence for Palliative Care, Western Norway, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway

5. Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital, Bergen, Norway

6. Department of Clinical Medicine (K1), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

7. Department of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland

8. Department of Quality of Life Research, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland

9. Sue Ryder House, Pallmed, Bydgoszcz, Poland

10. Mutualista Hospital Evangélico, Montevideo, Uruguay

11. Pallium Latinoamérica, Buenos Aires, Argentina

12. Instituto de Investigaciones Medicas Alfredo Lanari, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

13. Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina

14. Department of Internal Medicine, Campinas State University, Campinas, Brazil

15. Sumaré State Hospital, Campinas, Brazil

16. Academic Palliative and End-of-Life Care Department, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK

Abstract

Background: The provision of care for dying cancer patients varies on a global basis. In order to improve care, we need to be able to evaluate the current level of care. One method of assessment is to use the views from the bereaved relatives. Aim: The aim of this study is to translate and pre-test the ‘Care Of the Dying Evaluation’ (CODETM) questionnaire across seven participating countries prior to conducting an evaluation of current quality of care. Design: The three stages were as follows: (1) translation of CODE in keeping with standardised international principles; (2) pre-testing using patient and public involvement and cognitive interviews with bereaved relatives; and (3) utilising a modified nominal group technique to establish a common, core international version of CODE. Setting/participants: Hospital settings: for each country, at least five patient and public involvement representatives, selected by purposive sampling, fed back on CODETM questionnaire; and at least five bereaved relatives to cancer patients undertook cognitive interviews. Feedback was collated and categorised into themes relating to clarity, recall, sensitivity and response options. Structured consensus meeting held to determine content of international CODE (i-CODE) questionnaire. Results: In total, 48 patient and public involvement representatives and 35 bereaved relatives contributed to the pre-testing stages. No specific question item was recommended for exclusion from CODETM. Revisions to the demographic section were needed to be culturally appropriate. Conclusion: Patient and public involvement and bereaved relatives’ perceptions helped enhance the face and content validity of i-CODE. A common, core international questionnaire is now developed with key questions relating to quality of care for the dying.

Funder

Network of the European Union (EU) and the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) on Joint Innovation and Research Activities

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference35 articles.

1. The Economist Intelligence Unit. The 2015 quality of death index. Lien Foundation, https://www.eiuperspectives.economist.com/sites/default/files/2015%20EIU%20Quality%20of%20Death%20Index%20Oct%2029%20FINAL.pdf (2015, accessed 6 March 2018).

2. Pastrana T, De Lima L, Wenk R, et al. Atlas de cuidados paliativos de Latinoamérica ALCP, 1st ed. Houston, TX: IAHPC Press, http://hdl.handle.net/10171/34465 (2012, accessed 13 May 2018).

3. Royal College of Physicians (RCP). End of life care audit – dying in hospital. London: RCP, file:///C:/Users/crmay/AppvData/Local/Packages/Microsoft.MicrosoftEdge_8wekyb3d8bbwe/TempState/Downloads/EOLCA%20Report_0.pdf (2016, accessed 6 March 2018).

4. Bereaved family member perceptions of patient-focused family-centred care during the last 30 days of life using a mortality follow-back survey: does location matter?

5. Office for National Statistics. National survey of bereaved people (VOICES) 2014. Office for National Statistics, https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/healthcaresystem/bulletins/nationalsurveyofbereavedpeoplevoices/2015-07-09 (accessed 28 February 2018).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3