Exploring the Nature of Seismic Events in the Underground Gas Storages Area of the Volga Federal District-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Exploring the Nature of Seismic Events in the Underground Gas Storages Area of the Volga Federal District

Published:2022-11-23 Issue: Volume: Page:1-16
ISSN:1681-1208
Container-title:Russian Journal of Earth Sciences
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Batugin Andrian¹,Ogadzhanov Viktor²,Han Sergey³,Shevchuk Stepan³³,Kostikov Sergey³,Oborin Anton³

Affiliation:

1. NITU "MISiS"

2. Saratovskiy nacional'nyy issledovatel'skiy gosudarstvennyy universitet imeni N.G. Chernyshevskogo

3. PAO "Gazprom"

Abstract

Seismicity during UGS operation had not yet been known in Russia. This work presents studies on the manifestation of seismicity in the area of three underground gas storages (UGSs) located in the south-eastern part of the East European Platform (European part of Russia). The tectonic structure of this region, geodynamic conditions and technological characteristics of «Vostochnoye», «Zapadnoye», «Uzhnoye» UGS are presented. An analysis of the situation with the manifestation of seismicity allows us to conclude that it is technogenic in nature, a feature not previously noted on Russian UGSs. There is a wide list of signs indicating the relationship between the mode of operation of UGSs and the nature of seismicity: prior to the start of UGS operation technogenic seismicity in this area was not known; there is a clear correlation between UGS operation and seismicity; the epicenters of seismic phenomena are located in the geodynamic influence zone of the UGS; in the region there are Earth crustal faults that experienced activation in late Cenozoic time and respond to strong earthquakes of neighboring tectonic areas, which consequently indicates their predisposition to reactivation; the change in pressure in the UGS reservoir is sufficient to induce seismicity. The phenomenon of increasing seismic activity during the gas extraction period is noted, which is explained by the effect of softening of the containing massif and its subsequent push-like deformation when the gas pressure in the reservoir is reduced. Despite the weak seismicity, which does not pose a threat to UGS facilities and adjacent territories, it is proposed to include seismic observations in the complex geodynamic monitoring at Russian UGS to establish patterns over a long period of time.

Publisher

Geophysical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Reference59 articles.

1. Adushkin, V. V., and S. B. Turuntaev (2015), Technogenic seismicity – induced and triggered, 364 pp., IDG RAN, Moscow., Adushkin, V. V., and S. B. Turuntaev (2015), Technogenic seismicity – induced and triggered, 364 pp., IDG RAN, Moscow.

2. Batugin, A. S. (2021), A proposed classification of the Earth’s crustal areas by the level of geodynamic threat, Geodesy and Geodynamics, 12, 21–30, doi:10.1016/j.geog.2020.10.002., Batugin, A. S. (2021), A proposed classification of the Earth’s crustal areas by the level of geodynamic threat, Geodesy and Geodynamics, 12, 21–30, doi:10.1016/j.geog.2020.10.002.

3. Benetatos, C., J. Málek, and F. Verga (2013), Moment tensor inversion for two micro-earthquakes occurring inside the Háje gas storage facilities, J Seismol. Czech Republic, pp. 557–576, doi:012-9337-0., Benetatos, C., J. Málek, and F. Verga (2013), Moment tensor inversion for two micro-earthquakes occurring inside the Háje gas storage facilities, J Seismol. Czech Republic, pp. 557–576, doi:012-9337-0.

4. Bossu, R., J. R. Grasso, L. M. Plotnikova, B. Nurtaev, J. Fréchet, and M. Moisy (1996), Complexity of intracontinental seismic faultings: The Gazli, Uzbekistan, sequence, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 86(4), 959–971., Bossu, R., J. R. Grasso, L. M. Plotnikova, B. Nurtaev, J. Fréchet, and M. Moisy (1996), Complexity of intracontinental seismic faultings: The Gazli, Uzbekistan, sequence, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 86(4), 959–971.

5. Butler, T. G., and B. S. Simser (2017), Microseismic Monitoring Strategy and Early Rockburst Experience during the development of Glencore’s Nickel Rim Deep and Onaping Depth Projects, in Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines, pp. 290–296, Santiago Chile, on 15-17 of November., Butler, T. G., and B. S. Simser (2017), Microseismic Monitoring Strategy and Early Rockburst Experience during the development of Glencore’s Nickel Rim Deep and Onaping Depth Projects, in Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines, pp. 290–296, Santiago Chile, on 15-17 of November.