Modeling the Horizontal Velocity Field of the Earth’s Crust in a Regular Grid from GNSS Measurements
Author:
Manevich Aleksandr12, Losev Ilya1, Avdonina Alina1, Shevchuk Roman13, Kaftan Vladimir1, Tatrinov Victor13
Affiliation:
1. Geophysical Center RAS 2. NUST MISiS 3. Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences
Abstract
There are numerous methods for modeling velocity fields of the Earth’s crust. However, only a few of them are capable of modeling data beyond the contour of the geodetic network (extrapolating). Spatial modeling based on a neural network approach allows for the adequate modeling of the field of recent crustal movements and deformations of the Earth’s crust beyond the geodetic network contour. The study extensively examines the hyperparameter settings and justifies the applicability of the neural network model for predicting crustal movement fields using the Ossetian geodynamic polygon as an example. The presented results, when compared to classical modeling methods, demonstrate that the neural network approach confidently yields results no worse than classical methods. The results of modeling for the Ossetian polygon can be used for geodynamic zoning, identification zones of extension and compression, computing the tectonic component of stresses, and identifying areas of high-gradient displacements.
Publisher
Geophysical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Reference69 articles.
1. Agayan, S. M., V. N. Tatarinov, A. D. Gvishiani, S. R. Bogoutdinov, and I. O. Belov (2020), FDPS algorithm in stability assessment of the Earth’s crust structural tectonic blocks, Russian Journal of Earth Sciences, 20, ES6014, https://doi.org/10.2205/2020ES000752, Agayan, S. M., V. N. Tatarinov, A. D. Gvishiani, S. R. Bogoutdinov, and I. O. Belov (2020), FDPS algorithm in stability assessment of the Earth’s crust structural tectonic blocks, Russian Journal of Earth Sciences, 20, ES6014, https://doi.org/10.2205/2020ES000752 2. Agayan, S. M., I. V. Losev, I. O. Belov, V. N. Tatarinov, A. I. Manevich, and M. A. Pasishnichenko (2022), Dynamic Activity Index for Feature Engineering of Geodynamic Data for Safe Underground Isolation of High-Level Radioactive Waste, Applied Sciences, 12(4), 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/app12042010, Agayan, S. M., I. V. Losev, I. O. Belov, V. N. Tatarinov, A. I. Manevich, and M. A. Pasishnichenko (2022), Dynamic Activity Index for Feature Engineering of Geodynamic Data for Safe Underground Isolation of High-Level Radioactive Waste, Applied Sciences, 12(4), 2010, https://doi.org/10.3390/app12042010 3. Aki, K. (1968), Seismic displacements near a fault, Journal of Geophysical Research, 73(16), 5359–5376, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB073i016p05359., Aki, K. (1968), Seismic displacements near a fault, Journal of Geophysical Research, 73(16), 5359–5376, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB073i016p05359. 4. Aleshin, I., K. Kholodkov, I. Malygin, R. Shevchuk, and R. Sidorov (2022), Geomagnetic Survey Interpolation with the Machine Learning Approach, Russian Journal of Earth Sciences, 22, https://doi.org/10.2205/2022ES000818., Aleshin, I., K. Kholodkov, I. Malygin, R. Shevchuk, and R. Sidorov (2022), Geomagnetic Survey Interpolation with the Machine Learning Approach, Russian Journal of Earth Sciences, 22, https://doi.org/10.2205/2022ES000818. 5. Allmendinger, R. W., N. Cardozo, and D. M. Fisher (2011), Structural Geology Algorithms: Vectors and Tensors, Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920202., Allmendinger, R. W., N. Cardozo, and D. M. Fisher (2011), Structural Geology Algorithms: Vectors and Tensors, Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920202.
|
|