Methodology for the American Society of Hematology VTE guidelines: current best practice, innovations, and experiences

Author:

Wiercioch Wojtek123ORCID,Nieuwlaat Robby123,Akl Elie A.34,Kunkle Robert5,Alexander Kendall E.5,Cuker Adam67ORCID,Rajasekhar Anita8,Alonso-Coello Pablo9,Anderson David R.10,Bates Shannon M.11,Cushman Mary612ORCID,Dahm Philipp1314ORCID,Guyatt Gordon3,Iorio Alfonso311ORCID,Lim Wendy11ORCID,Lyman Gary H.1516,Middeldorp Saskia17ORCID,Monagle Paul181920,Mustafa Reem A.321,Neumann Ignacio22,Ortel Thomas L.623ORCID,Rochwerg Bram311,Santesso Nancy123ORCID,Vesely Sara K.24ORCID,Witt Daniel M.25ORCID,Schünemann Holger J.12311ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada Centre,

2. McMaster GRADE Centre, and

3. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada;

4. Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon;

5. American Society of Hematology, Washington, DC;

6. Department of Medicine and

7. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA;

8. Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL;

9. Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau–Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública), Barcelona, Spain;

10. Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada;

11. Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada;

12. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT;

13. Urology Section, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN;

14. Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN;

15. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA;

16. Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA;

17. Department of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

18. Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia;

19. Department of Haematology, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia;

20. Haematology Research, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia;

21. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS;

22. Department of Internal Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile;

23. Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC;

24. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Hudson College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK; and

25. Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

Abstract

Background: Methods for the development of clinical guidelines have advanced dramatically over the past 2 decades to strive for trustworthiness, transparency, user-friendliness, and rigor. The American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines on venous thromboembolism (VTE) have followed these advances, together with application of methodological innovations. Objective: In this article, we describe methods and methodological innovations as a model to inform future guideline enterprises by ASH and others to achieve guideline standards. Methodological innovations introduced in the development of the guidelines aim to address current challenges in guideline development. Methods: We followed ASH policy for guideline development, which is based on the Guideline International Network (GIN)-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist and current best practices. Central coordination, specialist working groups, and expert panels were established for the development of 10 VTE guidelines. Methodological guidance resources were developed to guide the process across guidelines panels. A methods advisory group guided the development and implementation of methodological innovations to address emerging challenges and needs. Results: The complete set of VTE guidelines will include >250 recommendations. Methodological innovations include the use of health-outcome descriptors, online voting with guideline development software, modeling of pathways for diagnostic questions, application of expert evidence, and a template manuscript for publication of ASH guidelines. These methods advance guideline development standards and have already informed other ASH guideline projects. Conclusions: The development of the ASH VTE guidelines followed rigorous methods and introduced methodological innovations during guideline development, striving for the highest possible level of trustworthiness, transparency, user-friendliness, and rigor.

Publisher

American Society of Hematology

Subject

Hematology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3