Determination of the Volume of HPC, Apheresis Products Based on Weight in Grams

Author:

Keever-Taylor Carolyn A.1,Schmidt Kurt2,Zeng Hong2,Morris Dawn2,Heidtke Sarah2,Konings Steve2,Margolis David A1

Affiliation:

1. Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI

2. Froedtert Hospital, Milwaukee, WI

Abstract

Abstract Hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) collected by apheresis [HPC(A)] have become the most common source of HPC used for transplantation. HPC(A) products have a more variable content of CD34+ progenitor cells than marrow or umbilical cord blood, especially when collected from autologous donors. Most often the CD34+ cell content of previous collections is used to decide whether or not additional collections are needed to reach the target CD34+ cell infusion dose. Accurate assessment of CD34+ cell counts are imperitive in order to properly determine the need for additional apheresis procedures. CD34 content is typically measured by flow cytometry, either using a dual platform method that requires determination of the percentage of CD34+ cells within the total nucleated cells or a single platform method that uses counting beads to directly determine the number of CD34+ cells in a given volume of product. Both methods depend on accurate determination of the volume of the product in order to calculate the total number of CD34+ cells that have been collected. Volume estimates of HPC source products are most often performed using the product weight in grams (g) after subtracting the weight of the bag in which the product is collected. The weight is then divided by the product’s specific gravity to obtain the volume. The specific gravity of a substance is the ratio of the density of the substance to the density of a reference substance, such as water (1 g = 1 mL). The specific gravity of whole blood has been defined as approximately 1.058, whereas the specific gravity of platelet products is approximately 1.030. The difference between the two products is a function of the cellular content. Blood has a higher specific gravity since it contains more high-density cells (red blood cells (RBCs) and granulocytes) than platelet concentrates (largely platelets and lymphocytes). The composition of marrow is similar to blood, so a specific gravity of 1.058 is used. However, there are no published data that estimates the specific gravity of HPC(A) products and since these products are enriched for cells that are more dense than platelet products but less dense than whole blood products neither of the two established specific gravities is optimal to use. We sought to determine what the specific gravity of an apheresis product truly is so as to determine the optimal factor to estimate volume from weight for HPC(A) products. To this end our laboratory sampled 54 well-mixed HPC(A) products at receipt and used a reverse pipetting method and a sensitive analytical balance to weigh 1 mL aliquots of product. A hematology analyzer was used to measure the total number of white blood cells (WBC) and RBCs per mL of product. The 54 sampled products contained on average 2.7 ± 1.1 x 10E8 WBCs per mL and 5.5 ± 2.0E8 RBCs per mL, which is similar to the average seen for 823 products collected since 2010 of 2.81 ± 1.33 x 10E8 WBCs per mL. The weight in grams was significantly associated with the total number of RBCs + WBCs in a given product (p=0.026) but not with total WBC alone, indicating that RBC content was a contributing factor. The average weight (i.e. specific gravity) of 1.0 mL HPC(A) aliquots was 1.047 ± 0.009 g, a value between that of whole blood and platelet products. Based on these data we recommend that laboratories use a factor of 1.047 to convert the weight of HPC(A) products in grams to volume to more accurately determine the number of CD34+ cells contained in a given product. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Publisher

American Society of Hematology

Subject

Cell Biology,Hematology,Immunology,Biochemistry

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3