The Huntington’s Disease Health Index: Initial Evaluation of a Disease-Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measure

Author:

Brumfield Olivia S.1,Zizzi Christine E.12,Dilek Nuran3,Alexandrou Danae G.1,Glidden Alistair M.1,Rosero Spencer1,Weinstein Jennifer1,Seabury Jamison1,Kaat Aaron4,McDermott Michael P.35,Dorsey E. Ray13,Heatwole Chad R.13

Affiliation:

1. Center for Health + Technology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA

2. School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA

3. Department of Neurology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA

4. Department of Medical Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA

5. Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA

Abstract

Background: When developed properly, disease-specific patient reported outcome measures have the potential to measure relevant changes in how a patient feels and functions in the context of a therapeutic trial. The Huntington’s Disease Health Index (HD-HI) is a multifaceted disease-specific patient reported outcome measure (PROM) designed specifically to satisfy previously published FDA guidance for developing PROMs for product development and labeling claims. Objective: In preparation for clinical trials, we examine the validity, reliability, clinical relevance, and patient understanding of the Huntington’s Disease Health Index (HD-HI). Methods: We partnered with 389 people with Huntington’s disease (HD) and caregivers to identify the most relevant questions for the HD-HI. We subsequently utilized two rounds of factor analysis, cognitive interviews with fifteen individuals with HD, and test-retest reliability assessments with 25 individuals with HD to refine, evaluate, and optimize the HD-HI. Lastly, we determined the capability of the HD-HI to differentiate between groups of HD participants with high versus low total functional capacity score, prodromal versus manifest HD, and normal ambulation versus mobility impairment. Results: HD participants identified 13 relevant and unique symptomatic domains to be included as subscales in the HD-HI. All HD-HI subscales had a high level of internal consistency and reliability and were found by participants to have acceptable content, relevance, and usability. The total HD-HI score and each subscale score statistically differentiated between groups of HD participants with high versus low disease burden. Conclusion: Initial evaluation of the HD-HI supports its validity and reliability as a PROM for assessing how individuals with HD feel and function.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Neurology (clinical)

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3