Administration by algorithm: A risk management framework

Author:

Bannister Frank1,Connolly Regina2

Affiliation:

1. Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

2. Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland

Abstract

Algorithmic decision-making is neither a recent phenomenon nor one necessarily associated with artificial intelligence (AI), though advances in AI are increasingly resulting in what were heretofore human decisions being taken over by, or becoming dependent on, algorithms and technologies like machine learning. Such developments promise many potential benefits, but are not without certain risks. These risks are not always well understood. It is not just a question of machines making mistakes; it is the embedding of values, biases and prejudices in software which can discriminate against both individuals and groups in society. Such biases are often hard either to detect or prove, particularly where there are problems with transparency and accountability and where such systems are outsourced to the private sector. Consequently, being able to detect and categorise these risks is essential in order to develop a systematic and calibrated response. This paper proposes a simple taxonomy of decision-making algorithms in the public sector and uses this to build a risk management framework with a number of components including an accountability structure and regulatory governance. This framework is designed to assist scholars and practitioners interested in ensuring structured accountability and legal regulation of AI in the public sphere.

Publisher

IOS Press

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Communication,Information Systems

Reference30 articles.

1. Automated marking system for short answer examination (AMS-SAE);Ab Aziz;2009 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics & Applications,2009

2. Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability;Ananny;New Media & Society,2018

3. Illusions of Accountability: Credit and Blame Sensemaking in Public Administration;Anderson;Administrative Theory & Praxis,2009

4. Arntz, M., Gregory, T., & Zierahn, U. (2016), “The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis”, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 189, OECD Publishing, Paris.

5. EU High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (2019)“Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI”, European Commission, Brussels, Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Enhancing public service delivery efficiency: Exploring the impact of AI;Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity;2024-09

2. Citizens’ trust in AI-enabled government systems;Information Polity;2024-08-27

3. More than an IT system in the government: The work divide challenges in human-AI coworking context;Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research;2024-06-11

4. Who evaluates the algorithms? An overview of the algorithmic accountability ecosystem;Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research;2024-06-11

5. Artificial Intelligence in Risk Management;Artificial Intelligence for Risk Mitigation in the Financial Industry;2024-05-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3