Abstract
Good statistics can do a lot of good: They help to base decisions on factual arguments, they can simplify conflict resolution. This requires an understanding of the opportunities and risks, the strengths and limitations of statistical facts. Overestimation leads to exaggerated expectations and disappointments, underestimation to missed opportunities, risks. Even worse is the trouble if facts are influenced or manipulated with political intentions or if even the impression of arbitrariness is created with so-called ‘alternative facts’. The very bad excesses of political misuse of statistics are carried out with intent and not negligently. Nevertheless, it can be argued that the virus of false and manipulated information flourishes when the statistical literacy of the population is at a low level. On the less serious scale of missed opportunities or too high expectations regarding statistics, there are, of course, also observations that suggest that an improvement in statistical literacy would be very good for politics, both on the part of the population and on the part of politics itself. Overall, the aim must be to promote and nurture a culture in which a conscious and experienced approach regarding data and statistics has become the standard.
Subject
Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty,Economics and Econometrics,Management Information Systems
Reference34 articles.
1. Data literacy is statistical literacy;Gould;Statistics Education Research Journal,2017
2. 50 years of data science;Donoho;Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics,2017
3. Introduction article: Informational governance and environmental sustainability;Soma;Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,2016
4. Official statistics, public policy and public trust;Holt;Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society),2008
5. Davies W. How statistics lost their power – and why we should fear what comes next. The Guardian. 2017.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献