The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration

Author:

Bossuyt Patrick M1,Reitsma Johannes B1,Bruns David E23,Gatsonis Constantine A4,Glasziou Paul P5,Irwig Les M6,Moher David7,Rennie Drummond89,de Vet Henrica C W10,Lijmer Jeroen G1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Academic Medical Center—University of Amsterdam, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands

2. Department of Pathology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903

3. Clinical Chemistry, Washington, DC 20037

4. Centre for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912

5. Centre for General Practice, University of Queensland, Herston QLD 4006, Australia

6. Department of Public Health & Community Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia

7. Chalmers Research Group, Ottowa, Ontario, K1N 6M4 Canada

8. Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94118

9. Journal of the American Medical Association, Chicago, IL 60610

10. Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Free University, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract The quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy is less than optimal. Complete and accurate reporting is necessary to enable readers to assess the potential for bias in the study and to evaluate the generalisability of the results. A group of scientists and editors has developed the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy) statement to improve the reporting the quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The statement consists of a checklist of 25 items and flow diagram that authors can use to ensure that all relevant information is present. This explanatory document aims to facilitate the use, understanding and dissemination of the checklist. The document contains a clarification of the meaning, rationale and optimal use of each item on the checklist, as well as a short summary of the available evidence on bias and applicability. The STARD statement, checklist, flowchart and this explanation and elaboration document should be useful resources to improve reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Complete and informative reporting can only lead to better decisions in healthcare.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry

Cited by 811 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3