Effectiveness of Laboratory Practices to Reduce Specimen Labeling Errors at the Time of Specimen Collection in Healthcare Settings: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices (LMBP) Systematic Review

Author:

Sandhu Paramjit K1,Bandyopadhyay Kakali2,Hunt William3,Taylor Thomas H4,Birch Rebecca J5,Krolak John1,Ernst Dennis J6

Affiliation:

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Laboratory Research and Evaluation Branch, Division of Laboratory Systems, and Laboratory Services, Atlanta, GA

2. Deloitte Consulting LLP, Atlanta, GA

3. Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA

4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Laboratory Systems, Atlanta, GA

5. Westat, Rockville, MD

6. Center for Phlebotomy Education, Inc., Corydon, IN

Abstract

Abstract Background Specimen labeling errors have long plagued the laboratory industry, putting patients at risk of transfusion-related death, medication errors, misdiagnosis, and patient mismanagement. Many interventions have been implemented and deemed to be effective in reducing specimen error rates. The objective of this review was to identify and evaluate the effectiveness of laboratory practices and interventions to develop evidence-based recommendations for the best laboratory practices to reduce labeling errors. Content The standardized Laboratory Medicine Best Practices InitiativeTM A-6 methods were used to conduct this systematic review. Total evidence included 12 studies published from 1990 to September 2015. Combined data from 7 studies found that the interventions developed from improved communication and collaboration between the laboratory and clinical staff resulted in substantial decreases in specimen labeling errors [median relative percent change in labeling errors: −75.86; interquartile interval (IQI): −84.77, −58.00]. Further data from the subset of 4 studies showed a significant decrease in specimen labeling errors after the institution of the standardized specimen labeling protocols (median relative percent decrease in specimen labeling errors: −72.45; IQI: −83.25, −46.50). Summary Based on the evidence included in this review, interventions that enhance communication and collaboration between laboratory and healthcare professionals can decrease the number of specimen identification errors in healthcare settings. However, more research is needed to make any conclusion on the effectiveness of other evaluated practices in this review, including training and education of the specimen collection staff, audit and feedback of labeling errors, and implementation of new technology (other than barcoding).

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference34 articles.

1. Catching ID errors where it counts—in the lab;Ford;CAP Today,2005

2. Errors in transfusion medicine;Sauer;Lab Med,2001

3. Chemistry specimen acceptability: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 453 laboratories;Jones;Arch Pathol Lab Med,1997

4. Outpatient phlebotomy success and reasons for specimen rejection;Dale;Arch Pathol Lab Med,2002

5. Disabling mislabeling—solutions for blood banks;Ford;CAP Today,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3