Social Networks, Social Support, and Survival After Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Author:

Kroenke Candyce H.1,Kubzansky Laura D.1,Schernhammer Eva S.1,Holmes Michelle D.1,Kawachi Ichiro1

Affiliation:

1. From the University of California, San Francisco and Berkeley, CA; Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Abstract

Purpose We prospectively examined social ties and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. Patients and Methods Participants included 2,835 women from the Nurses' Health Study who were diagnosed with stages 1 to 4 breast cancer between 1992 and 2002. Of these women, 224 deaths (107 of these related to breast cancer) accrued to the year 2004. Social networks were assessed in 1992, 1996, and 2000 with the Berkman-Syme Social Networks Index. Social support was assessed in 1992 and 2000 as the presence and availability of a confidant. Cox proportional hazards models were used in prospective analyses of social networks and support, both before and following diagnosis, and subsequent survival. Results In multivariate-adjusted analyses, women who were socially isolated before diagnosis had a subsequent 66% increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 1.66; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.65) and a two-fold increased risk of breast cancer mortality (HR = 2.14; 95% CI, 1.11 to 4.12) compared with women who were socially integrated. Women without close relatives (HR = 2.65; 95% CI, 1.03 to 6.82), friends (HR = 4.06; 95% CI, 1.40 to 11.75), or living children (HR = 5.62; 95% CI, 1.20 to 26.46) had elevated risks of breast cancer mortality and of all-cause mortality compared with those with the most social ties. Neither participation in religious or community activities nor having a confidant was related to outcomes. Effect estimates were similar in analyses of postdiagnosis networks. Conclusion Socially isolated women had an elevated risk of mortality after a diagnosis of breast cancer, likely because of a lack of access to care, specifically beneficial caregiving from friends, relatives, and adult children.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference28 articles.

1. McDowell I, Newell C: Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires . New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 1996, p 125

2. Berkman LF, Glass T: Social integration, social networks, social support, and health . In: Berkman LF, Kawachi I, eds. Social Epidemiology. New York, NY, Oxford University Press, pp 137,2000-173

3. Haley WE: Family caregivers of elderly patients with cancer: Understanding and minimizing the burden of care. J Support Oncol 1:25,2003-29,

4. Mendes de Leon CF, Glass TA, Beckett LA, et al: Social networks and disability transitions across eight intervals of yearly data in the New Haven EPESE. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 54:S162,1999-S172,

5. The Effect of Group Psychosocial Support on Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3