Long-Term Engagement of Patients With Advanced Cancer

Author:

Patel Manali I.12,Agrawal Madhuri2,Blayney Douglas W.1,Bundorf M. Kate3,Milstein Arnold1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

2. VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California

3. Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina

Abstract

ImportanceThe long-term effect of interventions that assist patients with establishing their end-of-life care preferences among patients with cancer remain relatively unknown.ObjectiveTo evaluate the association of a long-term intervention of a lay health worker–led advance care planning intervention among patients with advanced stages of cancer with overall survival and end-of-life health care use and costs.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis follow-up study of the EPAC randomized clinical trial conducted between August 2013 and February 2015 used data from 9.4 years after the first patient was enrolled with a data cut-off date of February 1, 2023. Overall, 213 participants with stage 3 or 4 or recurrent cancer in the US Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System were included.InterventionsA 6-month lay health worker–led education and support intervention to assist patients with establishing their end-of-life preferences vs usual care.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe outcomes of interest were overall survival, risk of death, restricted mean survival time, and palliative care, hospice, and acute care use in the final 30 days before death for participants who died.ResultsAmong 213 participants randomized and included in the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean (SD) age was 69.3 (9.1) years; 211 (99.1%) were male, 2 (0.90%) were female. There were no demographic or clinical characteristic imbalances at enrollment. As of February 1, 2023, 188 had died. The intervention group had a 25% reduction in risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.56-0.98); more palliative care (44 [50.0%] vs 35 [35.0%]) and hospice use (64 [72.7%] vs 53 [53.0%]); and lower emergency department use (20 [22.7%] vs 47 [47.0%]), hospitalizations (17 [19.3%] vs 46 [46.0%]), and median (IQR) total health care costs (median [IQR], $1637 [$383-$9026] vs $18 520 [$4790-$50 729]) than control group participants.Conclusions and RelevanceThe effects of the lay health worker–led intervention remain durable, with nearly complete follow-up, supporting integration into routine cancer care.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02966509

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3