Understanding Molecular Testing Uptake Across Tumor Types in Eight Countries: Results From a Multinational Cross-Sectional Survey

Author:

Chambers Pinkie12,Man Kenneth K.C.134,Lui Vivian W.Y.5,Mpima Sheila6,Nasuti Paola6,Forster Martin D.7,Wong Ian C.K.123

Affiliation:

1. Research Department of Practice and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom

2. University College London Hospitals (UCLH) National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust/University College London Hospital-UCL Centre for Medicines Optimisation Research and Education, Cancer Division, London, United Kingdom

3. Centre for Safe Medication and Practice Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China

4. Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

5. School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China

6. IQVIA Real-World & Analytics Solutions, London, United Kingdom

7. Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute/UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

PURPOSE:The growth in understanding of molecular biology and genomics has augmented the development of targeted cancer treatments; however, challenges exist in access to molecular testing, an essential precursor to treatment decision-making. We used data from a cross-sectional survey to evaluate the differences in uptake of molecular testing,METHODS:Using the aggregated results of a questionnaire developed and distributed to clinicians by IQVIA, including treatment details and investigations undertaken for patients, we compared proportions of patients receiving molecular testing and targeted treatment by cancer type for the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Germany, Spain, South Korea, Japan, and China. We used multivariable logistic regression methods to understand the effect of country on the odds of receiving a molecular test.RESULTS:There was a total of 61,491 cases. Across countries and cancer types, uptake rates for molecular testing ranged between 2% and 98%, with the greatest differences seen in gastric cancers (range, 23% to 70%), and significant variations were observed for both European and Asian countries. China consistently demonstrated a significantly reduced uptake for all molecular tests assessed; however; uptake of drug treatment in gastric cancers after testing positive for the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene was higher than in some European countries (China, 85%; European range, 8% to 66%). The uptake of epidermal growth factor receptor gene testing was greater in some Asian countries relative to the United Kingdom, where incidence of lung cancer is higher (Japan: odds ratio, 3.1 [95% CI, 2.6 to 3.8]; South Korea: odds ratio, 2.7 [95% CI, 2 to 3.4]).CONCLUSION:We have highlighted inequity in access to molecular testing and subsequent treatments across countries, which warrants improvements.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Oncology (nursing),Health Policy,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3