Affiliation:
1. The University of Sydney
2. Melanoma Institute Australia
3. Australian National University
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Immunotherapies have significantly improved the overall survival for patients with advanced melanoma. However, almost half of such patients either do not respond to the therapy or develop resistance to it, subjecting patients to ineffective treatments and unnecessary costs. Predictive biomarker testing can ensure that the patient receives the most effective therapy thereby reducing costs and toxicities. This study was conducted prior to and alongside a clinical validation study of routine predictive biomarker testing for patients with advanced melanoma to gain an insight into the factors associated with successful implementation of this intervention.
Methods
We conducted semi-structured interviews (n=25) with health professionals and patients guided by the EPIS (Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment) framework to understand enablers and barriers of implementation. Data analysis involved inductive and deductive thematic analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).
Results
Health providers and patients consistently reported ‘clinical utility of predictive biomarker test’ as a major enabler, recognising that an effective test would assist in identifying likely non-responders and consequently avoid the side effects and other costs of ineffective treatment. Trust in data scientists, adaptability of the test platform, pre-existing organisational infrastructure, and supportive organisational implementation culture were also identified as factors that would support implementation. Lack of validated predictive biomarkers, resources and costs required to implement the test, and health providers’ knowledge, beliefs and concerns around the test were the principal factors that would impede implementation.
Conclusion
This study identifies factors influencing implementation of biomarkers as predictors of treatment response to immunotherapy for melanoma and potential strategies to overcome barriers impeding their transition from discovery to the clinic.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma;Carlino MS;The Lancet,2021
2. Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma;Larkin J;The New England journal of medicine,2015
3. Five-year survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma;Larkin J;New England Journal of Medicine,2019
4. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma (KEYNOTE-006): post-hoc 5-year results from an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study;Robert C;The Lancet Oncology,2019
5. Potential immune-related adverse events associated with monotherapy and combination therapy of ipilimumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab for advanced melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Almutairi AR;Frontiers in oncology,2020