Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Site-Specific Treatment Based on Gene Expression Profiling With Carboplatin and Paclitaxel for Patients With Cancer of Unknown Primary Site

Author:

Hayashi Hidetoshi1,Kurata Takayasu12,Takiguchi Yuichi3,Arai Makoto3,Takeda Koji4,Akiyoshi Kohei4,Matsumoto Koji5,Onoe Takuma5,Mukai Hirofumi6,Matsubara Nobuaki6,Minami Hironobu7,Toyoda Masanori7,Onozawa Yusuke8,Ono Akira8,Fujita Yoshihiko1,Sakai Kazuko1,Koh Yasuhiro9,Takeuchi Ayano10,Ohashi Yasuo11,Nishio Kazuto1,Nakagawa Kazuhiko1

Affiliation:

1. Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan

2. Kansai Medical University Hospital, Hirakata, Japan

3. Chiba University, Chiba, Japan

4. Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan

5. Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi, Japan

6. National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

7. Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan

8. Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi, Japan

9. Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan

10. Keio University, Tokyo, Japan

11. Chuo University, Hachioji, Japan

Abstract

PURPOSE Although gene expression profiling is a promising diagnostic technique to determine the tissue of origin for patients with cancer of unknown primary site (CUP), no clinical trial has evaluated yet site-specific therapy directed by this approach compared with empirical chemotherapy. We therefore performed a randomized study to assess whether such site-specific therapy improves outcome compared with empirical chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with CUP. PATIENTS AND METHODS Comprehensive gene expression profiling was performed by microarray analysis, and an established algorithm was applied to predict tumor origin. Patients with CUP were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive standard site-specific therapy or empirical paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC). The primary end point was 1-year survival rate. RESULTS One hundred thirty patients were randomly assigned and had sufficient biopsy tissue for molecular analysis. Efficacy analysis was performed for 50 and 51 patients in the site-specific therapy and empirical PC arms, respectively. Cancer types most commonly predicted were pancreatic (21%), gastric (21%), and lymphoma (20%). The 1-year survival rate was 44.0% and 54.9% for site-specific treatment and empirical PC ( P = .264), respectively. Median overall and progression-free survival were 9.8 and 5.1 months, respectively, for site-specific treatment versus 12.5 and 4.8 months for empirical PC ( P = .896 and .550, respectively). Median overall survival (16.7 v 10.6 months; P = .116) and progression-free survival (5.5 v 3.9 months; P = .018) were better for predicted more-responsive than less-responsive tumor types. CONCLUSION Site-specific treatment that was based on microarray profiling did not result in a significant improvement in 1-year survival compared with empirical PC, although prediction of the original site seemed to be of prognostic value.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3