Needs and Perspectives of Cancer Center Stakeholders for Access to Patient Values in the Electronic Health Record

Author:

Desai Anjali V.12ORCID,Agarwal Rajiv3ORCID,Epstein Andrew S.12ORCID,Kuperman Gilad J.4ORCID,Michael Chelsea L.4ORCID,Mittelstaedt Haley4,Connor MaryAnn56ORCID,Bernal Camila1ORCID,Lynch Kathleen A.7ORCID,Ostroff Jamie S.7ORCID,Katz Brittany28,Corrigan Kelsey L.9ORCID,Kramer Dana10ORCID,Davis Mary Elizabeth11ORCID,Nelson Judith E.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

2. Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY

3. Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

4. Department of Health Informatics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

5. Department of Nursing Informatics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

6. New York University, New York, NY

7. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

8. Department of Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY

9. Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

10. Department of Advanced Practice Providers, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

11. Department of Nursing, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Abstract

PURPOSE: High-quality cancer care must incorporate patients' personal values in decision making throughout illness. Unfortunately, patient values are neither consistently elicited nor easily accessible in the electronic health record (EHR). Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center is deploying a major EHR innovation, called the Patient Values Tab, which provides ready access to patients' values and personhood. To inform the Tab's design, we interviewed a large, diverse group of institutional stakeholders to understand their user needs for this Tab. METHODS: Qualitative data were collected through semistructured, audio-recorded, in-person, individual interviews. An interdisciplinary team of four coders conducted a process of thematic content analysis. Thematic saturation was achieved, and member checking was performed. RESULTS: A total of 110 stakeholders were approached and interviewed. Participants comprised a wide range of disciplines or professions and others involved in hospital and/or clinic administration. Analysis revealed the following themes related to important Tab content: personhood, support system or resources, social history, communication preferences, future planning, end of life, and illness and treatment understanding. Participants also discussed implementation considerations, the Tab's potential to improve communication, and privacy implications. CONCLUSION: This study focused on a major EHR innovation to centralize information about values and personhood of patients with cancer. We elicited views of over 100 institutional stakeholders through in-depth interviews that were rigorously analyzed, yielding themes related to content and format that helped guide the Tab's design. The interviews generated a sense of ownership and enthusiasm for the Tab among future users. The Tab's introduction advances the use of the EHR as a driver of the delivery of patient-centered care.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Oncology(nursing),Health Policy,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3