Development and perception of surgery‐specific goals of care discussions in the preoperative setting: A learning pilot

Author:

Letica‐Kriegel Allison S.1ORCID,Rosen Roni1,McNeil Nita1,Thompson Errika1,James Monique2,Broach Vance1,Roche Kara Long1,Riportella Michaela3,Ng Susan1,Bernal Camila4,Vaynrub Max1,Downey Robert1,Voigt Louis2,Epstein Andrew S.4,Nelson Judith4,Goldfrank Deborah1,Nash Garrett M.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

2. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

3. Clinical Informatics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

4. Department of Medicine Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundGoals of care discussions are infrequently documented in the preoperative period. Furthermore, documentation does not consistently address what matters most to patients, although patient values (PV) are central to person‐centered care.MethodsA multidisciplinary working group was formed. An electronic note comprised of (1) topics of discussion, (2) PV, and (3) advance care planning (ACP), was created and embedded into existing note templates for Gynecologic Surgical Oncology. Surgeons and advanced practice providers (APPs) were educated to conduct and document these conversations in preoperative clinic for patients undergoing cancer surgery for a pilot period. Data were collected regarding usage of the template. Focus groups with surgeons, APPs, and patients were conducted. Qualitative analysis was performed on transcripts.ResultsDuring the pilot, 7 surgeon/APP teams utilized the template on a total of 55 notes. Average number of notes completed per surgeon was 7.8 (SD 8.5). Forty‐six notes (84%) included topics of discussion, 15 (27%) included PV, 4 (7%) included ACP. Qualitative analysis of focus group transcripts revealed that clinicians and patients perceived the initiative to be useful and important, although implementation barriers were identified.ConclusionCreating a surgery‐specific GOC template is feasible. Iterative revisions are needed to increase utility in clinic workflows.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3