Clinical Development Strategies and Outcomes in First-in-Human Trials of Monoclonal Antibodies

Author:

Tosi Diego1,Laghzali Yassine1,Vinches Marie1,Alexandre Marie1,Homicsko Krisztian1,Fasolo Angelica1,Del Conte Gianluca1,Durigova Anna1,Hayaoui Nadia1,Gourgou Sophie1,Gianni Luca1,Mollevi Caroline1

Affiliation:

1. Diego Tosi, Yassine Laghzali, Marie Vinches, Marie Alexandre, Nadia Hayaoui, Sophie Gourgou, and Caroline Mollevi, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier–Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France; Krisztian Homicsko, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne; Anna Durigova, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland; and Angelica Fasolo, Gianluca Del Conte, and Luca Gianni, San Raffaele–Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

Abstract

Purpose We conducted a comprehensive review of the design, implementation, and outcome of first-in-human (FIH) trials of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to clearly determine early clinical development strategies for this class of compounds. Methods We performed a PubMed search using appropriate terms to identify reports of FIH trials of mAbs published in peer-reviewed journals between January 2000 and April 2013. Results A total of 82 publications describing FIH trials were selected for analysis. Only 27 articles (33%) reported the criteria used for selecting the starting dose (SD). Dose escalation was performed using rule-based methods in 66 trials (80%). The median number of planned dose levels was five (range, two to 13). The median of the ratio between the highest planned dose and the SD was 27 (range, two to 3,333). Although in 56 studies (68%) at least one grade 3 or 4 toxicity event was reported, no dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 47 trials (57%). The highest planned dose was reached in all trials, but the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was defined in only 13 studies (16%). The median of the ratio between MTD and SD was eight (range, four to 1,000). The recommended phase II dose was indicated in 34 studies (41%), but in 25 (73%) of these trials, this dose was chosen without considering toxicity as the main selection criterion. Conclusion This literature review highlights the broad design heterogeneity of FIH trials testing mAbs. Because of the limited observed toxicity, the MTD was infrequently reached, and therefore, the recommended phase II dose for subsequent clinical trials was only tentatively defined.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3