Oncology Medical Home: ASCO and COA Standards

Author:

Woofter Kim1,Kennedy Erin B.2ORCID,Adelson Kerin3,Bowman Ronda2ORCID,Brodie Rachel4,Dickson Natalie5ORCID,Gerber Rose6,Fields Karen K.7,Murtaugh Carol8,Polite Blase9ORCID,Paschall Marcus9,Skelton Matthew10ORCID,Zoet Dennis11ORCID,Cox John V.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Advanced Centers for Cancer Care, South Bend, IN

2. American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA

3. Yale University, New Haven, CT

4. Purchaser Business Group on Health, San Francisco, CA

5. Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN

6. COA Patient Advocacy Network, Washington, DC

7. Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

8. Hematology and Oncology Consultants PC, Omaha, NE

9. UChicago Medicine, Chicago, IL

10. Blue Ridge Cancer Care, Roanoke, VA

11. Cancer and Hematology Centers of Western Michigan, Grand Rapids, MI

12. UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

Abstract

PURPOSE: To provide Standards on the basis of evidence and expert consensus for a pilot of the Oncology Medical Home (OMH) certification program. The OMH model is a system of care delivery that features coordinated, efficient, accessible, and evidence-based care and includes a process for measurement of outcomes to facilitate continuous quality improvement. The OMH pilot is intended to inform further refinement of Standards for OMH model implementation. METHODS: An Expert Panel was formed, and a systematic review of the literature on the topics of OMH, clinical pathways, and survivorship care plans was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar. Using this evidence base and an informal consensus process, the Expert Panel developed a set of OMH Standards. Public comments were solicited and considered in preparation of the final manuscript. RESULTS: Three comparative peer-reviewed studies of OMH met the inclusion criteria. In addition, the results from 16 studies of clinical pathways and one systematic review of survivorship care plans informed the evidence review. Limitations of the evidence base included the small number of studies of OMH and lack of longer-term outcomes data. More data were available to inform the specific Standards for pathways and survivorship care; however, outcomes were mixed for the latter intervention. The Expert Panel concluded that in the future, practices should be encouraged to publish the results of OMH interventions in peer-reviewed journals to improve the evidence base. STANDARDS: Standards are provided for OMH in the areas of patient engagement, availability and access to care, evidence-based medicine, equitable and comprehensive team-based care, quality improvement, goals of care, palliative and end-of-life care discussions, and chemotherapy safety. Additional information, including a Standards implementation manual, is available at www.asco.org/standards .

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Oncology(nursing),Health Policy,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3