Effects of a Geriatric Assessment Intervention on Patient-Reported Symptomatic Toxicity in Older Adults With Advanced Cancer

Author:

Culakova Eva1ORCID,Mohile Supriya G.2,Peppone Luke12ORCID,Ramsdale Erika2ORCID,Mohamed Mostafa23ORCID,Xu Huiwen4ORCID,Wells Megan2,Tylock Rachael2ORCID,Java Jim5ORCID,Loh Kah Poh2ORCID,Magnuson Allison2ORCID,Jamieson Leah6ORCID,Vogel Victor7,Duberstein Paul R.8ORCID,Chapman Benjamin P.9,Dale William10ORCID,Flannery Marie Anne11ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Supportive Care in Cancer, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY

2. James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY

3. Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY

4. School of Public and Population Health and Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX

5. Center for Advanced Research Technology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY

6. Metro Minnesota Community Oncology Research Program, St Louis Park, MN

7. Geisinger Cancer Institute, Danville, PA

8. Department of Health Behavior, Society, and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ

9. Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY

10. City of Hope National Medical Center, Department of Supportive Care Medicine, Duarte, CA

11. School of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY

Abstract

PURPOSE Providing a geriatric assessment (GA) summary with management recommendations to oncologists reduces clinician-rated toxicity in older patients with advanced cancer receiving treatment. This secondary analysis of a national cluster randomized clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02054741 ) aims to assess the effects of a GA intervention on symptomatic toxicity measured by Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). METHODS From 2014 to 2019, the study enrolled patients age ≥ 70 years, with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma and ≥ 1 GA domain impairment, who were initiating a regimen with high prevalence of toxicity. Patients completed PRO-CTCAEs, including the severity of 24 symptoms (11 classified as core symptoms) at enrollment, 4-6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Symptoms were scored as grade ≥ 2 (at least moderate) and grade ≥ 3 (severe/very severe). Symptomatic toxicity was determined by an increase in severity during treatment. A generalized estimating equation model was used to assess the effects of the GA intervention on symptomatic toxicity. RESULTS Mean age was 77 years (range, 70-96 years), 43% were female, and 88% were White, 59% had GI or lung cancers, and 27% received prior chemotherapy. In 706 patients who provided PRO-CTCAEs at baseline, 86.1% reported at least one moderate symptom and 49.7% reported severe/very severe symptoms at regimen initiation. In 623 patients with follow-up PRO-CTCAE data, compared with usual care, fewer patients in the GA intervention arm reported grade ≥ 2 symptomatic toxicity (overall: 88.9% v 94.8%, P = .035; core symptoms: 83.4% v 91.7%, P = .001). The results for grade ≥ 3 toxicity were comparable but not significant ( P > .05). CONCLUSION In the presence of a high baseline symptom burden, a GA intervention for older patients with advanced cancer reduces patient-reported symptomatic toxicity.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3