A Scalable Quality Assurance Process for Curating Oncology Electronic Health Records: The Project GENIE Biopharma Collaborative Approach

Author:

Lavery Jessica A.1ORCID,Lepisto Eva M.2,Brown Samantha1ORCID,Rizvi Hira1,McCarthy Caroline1,LeNoue-Newton Michele3,Yu Celeste4ORCID,Lee Jasme1,Guo Xindi5ORCID,Yu Thomas5ORCID,Rudolph Julia1,Sweeney Shawn6,Park Ben Ho3ORCID,Warner Jeremy L.3ORCID,Bedard Philippe L.4ORCID,Riely Gregory1ORCID,Schrag Deborah2,Panageas Katherine S.1,

Affiliation:

1. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

2. Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston, MA

3. Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN

4. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON

5. Sage Bionetworks, Seattle, WA

6. American Association for Cancer Research, Philadelphia, PA

Abstract

PURPOSE The American Association for Cancer Research Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange Biopharma Collaborative is a multi-institution effort to build a pan-cancer repository of genomic and clinical data curated from the electronic health record. For the research community to be confident that data extracted from electronic health record text are reliable, transparency of the approach used to ensure data quality is essential. MATERIALS AND METHODS Four institutions participating in AACR's Project GENIE created an observational cohort of patients with cancer for whom tumor molecular profiling data, therapeutic exposures, and treatment outcomes are available and will be shared publicly with the research community. A comprehensive approach to quality assurance included assessments of (1) feasibility of the curation model through pressure test cases; (2) accuracy through programmatic queries and comparison with source data; and (3) reproducibility via double curation and code review. RESULTS Assessments of feasibility resulted in critical modifications to the curation directives. Queries and comparison with source data identified errors that were rectified via data correction and curator retraining. Assessment of intercurator reliability indicated a reliable curation model. CONCLUSION The transparent quality assurance processes for the GENIE BPC data ensure that the data can be used for analyses that support clinical decision making and advances in precision oncology.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3