Validation of RUBY for Breast Cancer Knowledge Extraction From a Large French Electronic Medical Record System

Author:

Schiappa Renaud1ORCID,Contu Sara1,Culie Dorian2ORCID,Chateau Yann1,Gal Jocelyn1ORCID,Pace-Loscos Tanguy1,Bailleux Caroline3ORCID,Haudebourg Juliette4,Ferrero Jean-Marc3,Barranger Emmanuel3,Chamorey Emmanuel1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Data, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France

2. Cervico-facial Oncology Surgical Department, University Institute of Face and Neck, Nice, France

3. Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France

4. Anatomy and Pathological Cytology Laboratory, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France

Abstract

PURPOSE RUBY is a tool for extracting clinical data on breast cancer from French medical records on the basis of named entity recognition models combined with keyword extraction and postprocessing rules. Although initial results showed a high precision of the system in extracting clinical information from surgery, pathology, and biopsy reports (≥92.7%) and good precision in extracting data from consultation reports (81.8%), its validation is needed before its use in routine practice. METHODS In this work, we analyzed RUBY's performance compared with the manual entry and we evaluated the generalizability of the approach on different sets of reports collected on a span of 40 years. RESULTS RUBY performed similarly or better than the manual entry for 15 of 27 variables. It showed similar performances when structuring newer reports but failed to extract entities for which changes in terminology appeared. Finally, our tool could automatically structure 15,990 reports in 77 minutes. CONCLUSION RUBY can automate the data entry process of a set of variables and reduce its burden, but a continuous evaluation of the format and structure of the reports and a subsequent update of the system is necessary to ensure its robustness.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3