Shared Decision Making in Oncology and Its Implementation in Cervical Cancer Management in the Philippines: A Narrative Review

Author:

Bacorro Warren123ORCID,Short Michala4ORCID,Baldivia Kathleen3ORCID,Mariano Jocelyn56,Bautista Aida7,Amparo Genalin8,Tagayuna Irene9,Jainar Carl Jay3ORCID,Antonio Linda3,Dancel Evelyn3,Ortin Teresa Sy3ORCID,Gonzalez Gil56,Canlas Rodel110ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Graduate School, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines

2. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, University of Santo Tomas—Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Manila, Philippines

3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Santo Tomas Hospital—Benavides Cancer Institute, Manila, Philippines

4. UniSA Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Santo Tomas—Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Manila, Philippines

6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Santo Tomas Hospital, Manila, Philippines

7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Manila Doctors Hospital, Manila, Philippines

8. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Manila, Philippines

9. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, De Los Santos Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines

10. Department of Psychology, University of Santo Tomas—College of Science, Manila, Philippines

Abstract

PURPOSE Shared decision making (SDM) is an approach where clinicians and patients make decisions together using the best available evidence. Although much studied, recognized to be ethically imperative, and recommended in international health policies, it remains poorly implemented. In the Philippines, there are limited studies on patient decision making preferences and SDM. Practical guidance on the implementation of SDM or use of patient decision aids (PtDAs) is often not detailed in existing national clinical practice guidelines in oncology. METHODS We performed a systematic search of Philippine literature on SDM in oncology and an iterative review of international literature on the philosophy and methods of SDM, the utility and effectiveness of PtDAs, and the facilitators and barriers to implementation or usage. We contextualized our review to the cervical cancer management and health service delivery in the Philippines. RESULTS Local literature is limited to five scientific publications and two registered studies. International literature encompasses patient decisional preferences, the role of PtDAs and the standards for their development and evaluation, their effectiveness, and barriers and facilitators to their use in cancer-related decision making. We discussed the implications on the management of cervical cancer in the Philippines, challenges in health service delivery and standards, and SDM research. CONCLUSION Local SDM research is limited. Our preliminary experience in a multicenter clinical trial in Manila on PtDA use in the framework of SDM in cervical cancer suggest good patient and clinician acceptability. Challenges to implementation such as unfavorable financial situations, urgency of clinical decisions, low patient or caregiver educational attainment, and poor integration of multidisciplinary and SDM in organizational workflows will be important when implementing SDM in different settings.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3