Decisional control preferences among patients with advanced cancer: An international multicenter cross-sectional survey

Author:

Yennurajalingam Sriram1,Rodrigues Luis Fernando2,Shamieh Omar M3,Tricou Colombe4,Filbet Marilène4,Naing Kyaw5,Ramaswamy Akhileshwaran5,Perez-Cruz Pedro Emilio6,Bautista Mary Jocylyn S7,Bunge Sofia8,Muckaden Mary Ann9,Fakrooden Sarah10,Sewram Vikash11,Tejedor Antonio Noguera12,Rao Shobha S13,Williams Janet L1,Liu Diane D1,Park Minjeong1,Lu Zhanni1,Cantu Hilda1,Hui David1,Reddy Suresh K1,Bruera Eduardo1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

2. Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil

3. King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan

4. Centre Hospitalier de Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France

5. HCA Hospice care, Singapore

6. Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile

7. Benavides Cancer Institute, Manila, Philippines

8. Programa Argentino De Medicina, Olavaria, Argentina

9. Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India

10. Highway Hospice, Durban, South Africa

11. University of Stellenbosch, Capetown, South Africa

12. Hospital Centro de Cuidados Laguna, Madrid, Spain

13. LBJ Hospital, Houston, TX, USA

Abstract

Background: Understanding patients’ decision control preferences is important in providing quality cancer care. Patients’ decisional control preference can be either active (patients prefer to make decisions themselves), shared (collaborative between patient, their physician, and/or family), or passive (patients prefer that the decisions are made by either the physician and/or their family). Aim: To determine the frequency and predictors of passive decision control preferences among advanced cancer patients. We also determined the concordance between actual decision-making and decision control preferences and its association with patient satisfaction. Design: In this cross-sectional survey of advanced cancer patients referred to palliative care across 11 countries, we evaluated sociodemographic variables, Control Preference Scale, and satisfaction with the decisions and care. Results: A total of 1490 participants were evaluable. Shared, active, and passive decision control preferences were 33%, 44%, and 23%, respectively. Passive decision control preferences (odds ratio, p value) was more frequent in India (4.34, <0.001), Jordan (3.41, <0.001), and France (3.27, <0.001). Concordance between the actual decision-making and decision control preferences was highest in the United States ( k = 0.74) and lowest in Brazil (0.34). Passive decision control preference was significantly associated with (odds ratio per point, p value) better performance status (0.99/point, 0.017), higher education (0.64, 0.001), and country of origin (Brazil (0.26, <0.0001), Singapore (0.25, 0.0003), South Africa (0.32, 0.0002), and Jordan (2.33, 0.0037)). Conclusion: Passive decision control preferences were less common (23%) than shared and active decision control preference even among developing countries. Significant predictors of passive decision control preferences were performance status, education, and country of origin.

Funder

Sister Institution Network Fund

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3