American Society of Clinical Oncology/National Comprehensive Cancer Network Quality Measures

Author:

Desch Christopher E.1,McNiff Kristen K.2,Schneider Eric C.2,Schrag Deborah2,McClure Joan2,Lepisto Eva2,Donaldson Molla S.2,Kahn Katherine L.2,Weeks Jane C.2,Ko Clifford Y.2,Stewart Andrew K.2,Edge Stephen B.2

Affiliation:

1. Deceased. The authors wish to dedicate this work to Dr Desch, who died tragically during the manscript preparation

2. From the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Fort Washington, PA; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; RAND, Santa Monica; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL; Roswell Park Cancer Institute and the University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY

Abstract

PurposeThe National Cancer Policy Board recommended the creation of quality measures and a national reporting system in 1999. Representatives from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) collaborated to create metrics suitable for national performance measurement.MethodsContent and methodology experts nominated by ASCO and NCCN met to select and refine metrics for breast, colon, and rectal cancer based on National Initiative for Cancer Care Quality and NCCN measures and NCCN and ASCO guidelines. Measures were selected based on their impact on disease free and overall survival, the degree to which opportunities for improvement exist, and the feasibility of data collection.ResultsThree breast cancer measures and four colorectal cancer measures were chosen. Measures for breast cancer included adjuvant hormone therapy for hormone receptor–positive tumors, chemotherapy for hormone receptor–negative cancer, and radiation after lumpectomy. Colorectal measures included adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy for rectal cancer, and adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. All but one were recommended as accountability measures and one for quality improvement (removal and examination of 12 or more lymph nodes in colon cancer). Specifications were developed for each measure using tumor registries as the data source.ConclusionASCO/NCCN measures can be implemented by health systems, provider groups or payors for improvement or accountability using local tumor registries to furnish data on staging and treatment.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 198 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3