A Process for Measuring the Quality of Cancer Care: The Quality Oncology Practice Initiative

Author:

Neuss Michael N.1,Desch Christopher E.1,McNiff Kristen K.1,Eisenberg Peter D.1,Gesme Dean H.1,Jacobson Joseph O.1,Jahanzeb Mohammad1,Padberg Jennifer J.1,Rainey John M.1,Guo Jeff J.1,Simone Joseph V.1

Affiliation:

1. From Oncology Hematology Care, Cincinnati, OH; Virginia Cancer Institute, Richmond; American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria; American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Fairfax, VA; California Cancer Care, Greenbrae, CA; Oncology Associates, Cedar Rapids, IA; N Shore Cancer Center, Peabody, MA; Boston Baskin Cancer Group, Memphis, TN; Louisiana Oncology Associates, Lafayette, LA; University of Cincinnati College of Pharmacy; Simone Consulting Company, Dunwoody, GA

Abstract

Purpose The Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) is a practice-based system of quality self-assessment sponsored by the participants and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). The process of quality evaluation, development of the pilot questionnaire, and preliminary results are reported. Methods Physicians from seven oncology groups developed medical record abstraction measures based on practice guidelines and consensus-supported indicators of quality care. Each practice completed two rounds of records review and received practice and aggregate results. Mean frequencies of responses for each indicator were compared among practices. Results Participants universally, if informally, find QOPI helpful, and results show statistically significant variation among practices for several indicators, including assessing pain in patients close to death, documentation of informed consent for chemotherapy, and concordance with granulocytic and erythroid growth factor administration guidelines. Measures with universally high concordance include the use of serotonin antagonist antiemetics according to the ASCO guideline; the presence of a pathology report in the record; the use of chemotherapy flow sheets; and adherence to standard chemotherapy recommendations for patients with certain stages of breast, colon, and rectal cancer. Concordance with quality indicators significantly changed between survey rounds for several measures. Conclusion Pilot results indicate that the QOPI process provides a rapid and objective measurement of practice quality that allows comparisons among practices and over time. It also provides a mechanism for measuring concordance with published guidelines. Most importantly, it provides a tool for practice self-examination that can promote excellence in cancer care.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference18 articles.

1. Rae A: Osler vindicated: The ghost of Flexner laid to rest. CMAJ 164:1860,2001-1861,

2. Hewitt M, Simone JV: Ensuring Quality Cancer Care . Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1999

3. Using State and Federal Claims Data to Evaluate the Patterns and Costs of Cancer Care

4. Quality of Non–Breast Cancer Health Maintenance Among Elderly Breast Cancer Survivors

5. The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3