Abstract
Abstract
In this study, we investigate the contact effects of stability, convergence, and divergence regarding the use of
the same linguistic construction in the same contact situation. To do that, we collected experimental production and judgment data
by native German speakers living in the Netherlands regarding their usage of the complementizer um ‘to’ in German
and compared those data to those of a control group of German speakers not in contact with Dutch. The results show that most
speakers show evidence for some contact-induced language change in their German. At the same time, speakers seem to experience
different contact effects, demonstrating that it is not the structural properties of the construction that result in one effect
over the other, but rather factors that pertain to the individual speakers. In particular, we argue that speakers can either focus
on the similarities or on the differences between their languages, to some extent driven by their attitudes towards their
languages and language change, and then over-generalize these similarities or differences to new contexts. Overall, this result
clearly underlines the importance of focusing on individual speakers as the initiators of language change, which is in line with a
usage-based approach.
Funder
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Reference43 articles.
1. Mechanisms of change in areal diffusion: new morphology and language contact
2. Similarity in Language Transfer Investigating Transfer of Light Verb Constructions From Dutch to German;Barking;Journal of Language Contact,2022
3. Investigating Language Transfer from a Usage-Based Perspective;Barking;International Journal of Bilingualism,2023
4. Verlust der Muttersprache in fremdsprachiger Umgebung
5. Interferenzfehler in der Muttersprache von in den Niederlanden lebenden Deutschen;Brons-Albert,1994