Affiliation:
1. Manchester Metropolitan University
Abstract
Abstract
This paper has two purposes. First, it constitutes an exploration of context from the perspective of some prominent historical pragmaticians, and/or as demonstrated by publications which represent/exemplify a particular approach within historical pragmatics (Jacobs and Jucker 1995; Archer and Culpeper 2003, 2011; Nevala 2011; Traugott 2004, 2011; 2012; Jucker and Taavitsainen 2014) as well as related disciplines such as historical sociolinguistics (Nevalainen and Raumolin-Brunberg 2003). Second, it explores my own (evolving) view in respect to context, often in response to the influential work of others, as evidenced in a selection of my work (Archer 2005, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014).
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference49 articles.
1. “Can innocent people be guilty?”
2. Questions and Answers in the English Courtroom (1640–1760)
3. Libelling Oscar Wilde: The case of Regina vs. John Sholto Douglas
4. Assessing Garrow’s Aggressive Questioning Style;Archer,2012
5. Historical Pragmatics: Evidence from the Old Bailey;Archer;Transactions of the Philological Society,2013
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献