Frankfurt and Cohen on bullshit, bullshiting, deception, lying, and concern with the truth of what one says
-
Published:2016-09-26
Issue:1
Volume:23
Page:53-67
-
ISSN:0929-0907
-
Container-title:New Theoretical Insights into Untruthfulness
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:P&C
Affiliation:
1. Loyola University Chicago
Abstract
This paper addresses the following three claims that Frankfurt makes about the concept of bullshit:
1. Bullshit requires the intention to deceive others.
2. Bullshit does not constitute lying (bullshit is “short of lying”).
3. The essence of bullshit is lack of concern with the truth of what one says.
I offer counterexamples to all three claims. By way of defending my counterexamples, I examine Cohen’s distinction between bullshiting and bullshit and argue that my examples are indeed cases of bullshiting that Frankfurt’s analysis is intended to cover. My examples of bullshitters who are very concerned to say only things that are true show that Frankfurt is mistaken in claiming that the “essence” of bullshit is lack of concern with the truth of what one says.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Behavioral Neuroscience,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,General Computer Science
Reference14 articles.
1. Lying, Deception, and Related Concepts
2. Lying and Deception
3. Deeper into bullshit;Cohen,2002
4. Deeper into bullshit;Cohen,2006
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献