Affiliation:
1. Institute for Linguistic Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences
2. National Research University Higher School of Economics, St. Petersburg, Russia
Abstract
Abstract
Although SAY-complementizers have been extensively documented, the question of the forms used in this
function and their specific properties has received less attention. The paper focuses on the complementizer tenine (an
action nominalization of SAY), which is used with communicative reception verbs (‘hear’, ‘read’, etc.), in a dialect of Chuvash (Turkic).
The main puzzle concerns the difference between tenine and the more general complementizer teze (the
same-subject converb of SAY) with respect to the controller of shifted first person (namely, teze, but not
tenine, disallows non-subject controllers). An account of this restriction based on three independent language-specific
constraints is offered. An alternative account is discussed whereby tenine (and teze) are
synchronically non-finite forms of SAY. The findings highlight the importance of the form of the complementizer as well as of
the choice of controller for shifted 1st person in SAY-based complementation and extend the typological parameters of indexical shift.
Publisher
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Communication,Language and Linguistics
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献