Reform in a general chemistry laboratory: how do students experience change in the instructional approach?

Author:

Chopra I.1234,O'Connor J.1234,Pancho R.1234,Chrzanowski M.1564,Sandi-Urena S.78910ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Chemistry

2. University of South Florida

3. Tampa

4. USA

5. Case Western Reserve University

6. Cleveland

7. School of Chemistry

8. University of Costa Rica

9. San Jose 2060

10. Costa Rica

Abstract

This qualitative study investigated the experience of a cohort of students exposed consecutively to two substantially different environments in their General Chemistry Laboratory programme. To this end, the first semester in a traditional expository programme was followed by a semester in a cooperative, problem-based, multi-week format. The focus on the experience of a change in the laboratory format is complementary understanding to that from participants exposed to a single format. This work used a phenomenological approach for the reduction, analysis, and interpretation of data gathered from semi-structured student interviews. Through deep analysis, five researchers distilled an outcome space with three fundamental features: (1) ten vectors of change that served as lens to analyse the phenomenon; (2) participants' ability to accurately characterise and differentiate the two instructional environments; and (3) an overarching descriptor that argues that a transition from mindless behaviour to mindful engagement subsumed the experience of a change in the laboratory environment. This outcome space is independent of participants' instructional style preferences. Findings from this work inform the design of laboratory experiences furthering the potential realisation of experimental education at the same time when they extend understanding of learning in the chemistry laboratory.

Publisher

Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

Subject

Education,Chemistry (miscellaneous)

Reference50 articles.

1. Abraham M. R., (1982), A descriptive instrument for use in investigating science laboratories, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 19(2), 155–165

2. Abraham M. R., (2011), What can be learned from laboratory activities? Revisiting 32 years of research, J. Chem. Educ., 88(8), 1020–1025

3. Addy T. M. and Blanchard M. R., (2010), The problem with reform from the bottom up: instructional practises and teacher beliefs of graduate teaching assistants following a reform-minded university teacher certificate programme, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 32(8), 1045–1071

4. Baxter Magolda M. B., (2004), Evolution of a constructivist conceptualization of epistemological reflection, Educ. Psychol., 39(1), 31–42

5. Bergin A., Sharp K., Gatlin T., Villalta-Cerdas A., Gower A. and Sandi-Urena S., (2013), Use of RateMyProfessors.com data as a supplemental tool for the assessment of general chemistry instruction, J. Chem. Educ., 90(3), 289–295

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3