“I don’t know, ask the chemists – I think it’s kind of a consensus among them” – Information practice in a problem-based beginner lab

Author:

Wellhöfer Larissa1ORCID,Machleid Mareike1,Lühken Arnim1

Affiliation:

1. Chemistry Education , Goethe University Frankfurt , Max-von-Laue Str. 7 , Frankfurt am Main , Hessen , Germany

Abstract

Abstract Information literacy is increasingly acknowledged as a contextual and social practice in teaching and research and can be beneficial to further our understanding of laboratory learning. However, there is a need for in-depth insight into the lived information practice in chemistry to develop contextualized information literacy instruction. This work explores the negotiation of information between beginners and experienced members of the chemistry community in a problem-based beginner laboratory. To this end, we conducted a qualitative study following the documentary method by audio-recording the students’ first lab session on-site. The reconstruction of the students’ information practice shows how beginners learn about group-specific knowledge through participation. The results highlight the importance of corporeal information to give meaning to textual and social information in the chemistry laboratory. Exemplified by the concept of acidification, our findings show how social and textual information alone is insufficient for beginner students’ understanding of tacit information. Physical experience and social guidance are necessary to develop shared conceptions between people in the chemistry laboratory practice. Beginner laboratory instruction could benefit from this work’s results by teaching beginners about the corporeal, social, and textual information modalities and showing how they connect in practice.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Education,Chemistry (miscellaneous)

Reference57 articles.

1. Association of College and Research Libraries. (2015). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Retrieved from https://connect.uni-frankfurt.de/Citrix/VDWeb/clients/HTML5Client/src/SessionWindow.html?launchid=1627979015022.

2. Bohnsack, R. (1999). Rekonstruktive Sozialforschung: Einführung in Methodologie und Praxis Qualitativer Forschung (3rd ed.). VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften GmbH. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kxp/detail.action?docID=6706818

3. Bohnsack, R. (2010). Documentary method and group discussions. In Qualitative Analysis and Documentary Method in International Educational Research (pp. 99–124). B. Budrich.

4. Bohnsack, R. (2013). Handbuch Qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft: Teil 2 Forschungstraditionen und Forschungsverfahren. In B. Friebertshäuser, A. Langer, & A. Prengel (Eds.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft (4th ed.). Beltz Verlagsgruppe.

5. Bohnsack, R. (2017). Praxeological sociology of knowledge and documentary method: Karl Mannheim’s framing of empirical research. In D. Kettler, & V. Meja (Eds.), Anthem companions to sociology. The anthem companion to Karl Mannheim (pp. 199–220). Anthem Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3