Comparison of beginner and advanced chemistry student teachers’ perspective on creativity – does it play a role in the chemistry classroom?

Author:

Keiner Liz1234ORCID,Graulich Nicole1234ORCID,Göttlich Richard1234ORCID,Pietzner Verena5264ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Justus-Liebig-University Giessen

2. Institute of Chemistry Education

3. 35392 Giessen

4. Germany

5. University of Oldenburg

6. 26129 Oldenburg

Abstract

Creativity has become an increasingly important competence in today's rapidly changing times. It is a central aspect of social development, but it is hardly discussed in schools and often neglected in the natural sciences. In order to promote creativity in science teaching in a targeted way, it is important to understand the perspectives and views of prospective teachers on this topic. For this purpose, a qualitative cross-sectional study was conducted with 83 German chemistry student teachers at the beginning and at the end of their study programme. We used concept maps and questionnaires to characterize changes in students’ perspective on creativity in the chemistry classroom during their course of study. The quantitative analysis of the concept maps and the content analysis of student's proposition revealed similarities and differences in students’ perspective on creativity between beginners and advanced student. All student teachers showed a diverse range of conceptions and views on creativity in general and in the context of chemistry education. Furthermore, almost all of the students had a positive attitude towards creativity and its integration in chemistry lessons. Although, there are no large differences in the perspective on creativity from beginner to advanced student teachers, subtle differences in students’ perspectives revealed that advanced students had a more sophisticated perspective on fostering creativity in students in their prospective classrooms.

Publisher

Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

Subject

Education,Chemistry (miscellaneous)

Reference70 articles.

1. Abd-El-Khalick F., Bell R. L. and Ledermann N. G., (1998), The nature of science and instructional practice: making the unnatural natural, Sci. Educ. , 82 , 417–436

2. Aktamis H. and Ergin Ö., (2008), The effect of scientific process skills education on students' scientific creativity, science attitudes and academic achievements, in Asia-Pacific forum on science learning and teaching , The Education University of Hong Kong, Department of Science, vol. 9, pp. 1–21

3. Aljughaiman A. and Mowrer-Reynolds E., (2005), Teachers' conceptions of creativity and creative students, J. Creative Behav. , 39 , 17–34

4. Andiliou A. and Murphy P. K., (2010), Examining variations among researchers' and teachers' conceptualizations of creativity: a review and synthesis of contemporary research, Rev. Educ. Res. , 5 , 201–219

5. Ayas M. B. and Sak U., (2014), Objective measure of scientific creativity: psychometric validity of the Creative Scientific Ability Test, Think. Skills. Creat. , 13 , 195–205

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3