Affiliation:
1. Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Chemistry Education, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany
2. University of Vechta, 49377 Vechta, Germany
Abstract
Reading is an integral part of chemistry education. The language of chemistry plays a major role when reading chemistry texts and textbooks. Reading textual and non-textual explanations impact students’ understanding of chemistry texts and textbooks. In our review we outline the importance of reading texts and textbooks in chemistry education. We offer different points of view to look at textbook research (conceptual, socio-historical, textual, non-textual) and reading research (readability and comprehensibility) and focus on reading research on textual and non-textual explanations. We point out two major shifts in research interests on texts, textbooks and reading: from readability to comprehensibility and from textual to non-textual explanations. We consider research from the 1950s until today and analyse literature concerning elementary, secondary and tertiary science and chemistry education. Finally, we review ideas for encouraging reading and conclude by presenting recommendations for chemistry education researchers and chemistry teachers on how to improve reading in chemistry education.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Subject
Education,Chemistry (miscellaneous)
Reference148 articles.
1. Al-Balushi S. M. and Al-Harthy I. S., (2015), Students' mind wandering in macroscopic and submicroscopic textual narrations and its relationship with their reading comprehension. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. , 16 (3), 680–688 10.1039/C5RP00052A
2. Allen G., Guzman-Alvarez A., Smith A., Gamage A., Molinaro M. and Larsen D. S., (2015), Evaluating the effectiveness of the open-access ChemWiki resource as a replacement for traditional general chemistry textbooks, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. , 16 (4), 939–948 10.1039/C5RP00084J
3. Ariasi N. and Mason L., (2014), From covert processes to overt outcomes of refutation text reading: The interplay of science text structure and working memory capacity through eye fixations, Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. , 12 , 493–523
4. Arya D. J., Hiebert E. H. and David Pearson P., (2011), The effects of syntactic and lexical complexity on the comprehension of elementary science texts, Int. Electron. J. Elem. Educ. , 4 (1), 107–125
5. Atkinson M. B., Croisant M. and Bretz S. L., (2021), Investigating first-year undergraduate chemistry students’ reasoning with reaction coordinate diagrams when choosing among particulate-level reaction mechanisms, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. , 22 (1), 199–213 10.1039/D0RP00193G
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献