Affiliation:
1. Department of Chemistry, University of South Florida, USA
Abstract
An explicit account of validity considerations within a published paper allows readers to evaluate the evidence that supports the interpretation and use of the data collected within a project. This editorial is meant to provide considerations on how validity has been presented and reviewed among papers submitted to Chemistry Education Research and Practice (CERP) that analyze quantitative data. Authors submitting to CERP are encouraged to make an explicit case for validity and this editorial describes the varying sources of evidence that can be used to organize the evidence presented for validity.
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Subject
Education,Chemistry (miscellaneous)
Reference20 articles.
1. Ardura D. and Perez-Bitrián A., (2018), The effect of motivation on the choice of chemistry in secondary schools: adaptation and validation of the Science Motivation Questionnaire II to Spanish students, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. , 19 , 905–918
2. Arjoon J. A., Xu X. Y. and Lewis J. E., (2013), Understanding the State of the Art for Measurement in Chemistry Education Research: Examining the Psychometric Evidence, J. Chem. Educ. , 90 , 536–545
3. Barbera J., Harshman J. and Komperda R. (ed.), The Chemistry Instrument Review and Assessment Library , 2022, https://chiral.chemedx.org , accessed July 29 2022
4. Cooper M. M., Underwood S. M. and Hilley C. Z., (2012), Development and validation of the implicit information from Lewis structures instrument (IILSI): do students connect structures with properties?, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. , 13 , 195–200
5. Costello A. B. and Osborne J., (2005), Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis, Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. , 10 , 7
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献