Faculty beliefs about the purposes for teaching undergraduate physical chemistry courses

Author:

Mack Michael R.1234,Towns Marcy H.1234

Affiliation:

1. Department of Chemistry

2. Purdue University

3. West Lafayette

4. USA

Abstract

We report the results of a phenomenographic analysis of faculty beliefs about the purposes for teaching upper-division physical chemistry courses in the undergraduate curriculum. A purposeful sampling strategy was used to recruit a diverse group of faculty for interviews. Collectively, the participating faculty regularly teach or have taught physical chemistry courses in 16 different chemistry departments in the United States. While faculty agreed that the goal of teaching physical chemistry was to help students develop robust conceptual knowledge of the subject matter within thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, quantum mechanics, spectroscopy, chemical kinetics, and other major topics, some articulated strong beliefs about epistemic and social learning goals. An understanding of the relations between different ways of thinking about teaching upper-division physical chemistry courses offers practitioners with alternative perspectives that may help them expand their awareness of the purposes for teaching physical chemistry in the undergraduate curriculum. Furthermore, knowledge of faculty beliefs about their teaching provides educational researchers and curriculum developers with an understanding about the potential opportunities or barriers for helping faculty align their beliefs and goals for teaching with research-based instructional strategies. We discuss our findings with the intention to expand faculty awareness of the discourse on physical chemistry education to include various perspectives of the purpose for teaching upper-division physical chemistry courses.

Publisher

Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

Subject

Education,Chemistry (miscellaneous)

Reference85 articles.

1. AAAS, (2013), Describing and Measuring Undergraduate STEM Teaching Practices: A Report from a National Meeting on the Measurement of Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Teaching, retrieved from http://ccliconference.org/files/2013/11/Measuring-STEM-Teaching-Practices.pdf

2. Åkerlind G. S., (2004), A new dimension to understanding university teaching, Teaching in Higher Education, 9(3), 363–375

3. Åkerlind G. S., (2008), A phenomenographic approach to developing academics' understanding of the nature of teaching and learning, Teaching in Higher Education, 13(6), 633–644

4. Association of American Universities, (2011), Undergraduate STEM Initiative, retrieved from http://www.aau.edu/policy/article.aspx?id=12588

5. Austin A. E., (2011), Promoting evidence-based change in undergraduate science education, paper presented at the Fourth Committee Meeting on Status, Contributions, and Future Directions of Discipline-Based Education Research

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3