Blending muddiest point activities with the common formative assessments bolsters the performance of marginalized student populations in general chemistry

Author:

Muteti Caroline Z.1,Kerr Tracy1,Mwavita Mwarumba2ORCID,Mutambuki Jacinta M.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Chemistry, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA

2. Department of Research, Evaluation, Measurement, and Statistics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA

Abstract

Formative assessments (FAs), such as muddiest point activities can capture students’ areas of confusion or struggle on given content that may otherwise be overlooked with the common FAs, such as quizzes, homework, and clickers. The few reported studies indicate mixed results on the effects of implementing the muddiest point in undergraduate STEM or chemistry courses. Additionally, the commonly reported implementation model involves the short cycle—asking the areas of confusion at the end of the lesson on instructor pre-chosen topics. Using a quasi-experimental study design, we investigated the effects of blending the muddiest point activities at each Chapter (medium cycle) with the usual common FAs on performance in the General Chemistry 1 course. In one lecture section, students were exposed to the muddiest point and the common FAs, whereas in another lecture students were exposed to the common FAs alone. Results showed students in the treatment group performed significantly (p< 0.05) better on all three midterm exams than their counterparts who were exposed to the usual common FAs only. The mean difference in the final exam was not statistically significant (p> 0.05), even though the treatment group showed a slightly higher mean score than the comparison group. MANCOVA results showed a statistically significant main effect of the FA type and statistically significant interactions between the FA type and demographic variables, particularly gender and first-generation status, and race/ethnicity and first-generation status on performance, after controlling for ACT Math scores. Between-subject tests revealed significantly higher mean scores on some midterm exams for minority, minority-first-generation, and female-first-generation students in the treatment group compared to their peers in the comparison group. The findings imply that muddiest point activities can promote equitable access to learning for all students and bolster performance, particularly for marginalized students.

Funder

Oklahoma State University

Publisher

Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)

Subject

Education,Chemistry (miscellaneous)

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3