Affiliation:
1. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University) ; Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
2. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Abstract
Introduction. Induction of labor is one of the most frequent procedures in modern obstetrics, which reduces the frequency of cesarean section and improves pregnancy outcomes. However, the effectiveness and safety of labor induction methods vary. Currently, the vaginal therapeutic system (SVT) with dinoprostone is certified for use for childbirth in Russia. Aim. To conduct a review of the literature data and a pilot study of the effectiveness and safety of the vaginal therapeutic system with dinoprostone for induction of labor. Materials and methods. A review of the literature for 2001–2022 devoted to the use of vaginal systems with gradual release of prostaglandin for induction of labor was conducted. Additionally, a prospective observational study of the effectiveness and safety of the dinoprostone system was conducted in 18 pregnant women. The evaluation criteria were: the frequency of labor, the degree of maturation of the cervix on the Bishop scale, as well as the frequency of vaginal delivery. Results. Literature data indicate that SVT with dinoprostone has comparable efficacy with other methods of pre-induction / induction of labor. The system with dinoprostone has a lower frequency of the side effect of “tachysystole” than the system with misoprostol. Compared with mechanical methods, SVT is assotiated with a lower frequency of oxytocin use. The use of SVT with dinoprostone showed an efficiency of 77.8% (in terms of the of labor start or cervical ripening). No side effects requiring termination of labor induction were registered in our study. Conclusions. Thus, vaginal insertion with prostaglandin E2 – dinoprostone is an effective and safe method of pre-induction of labor. Taking into account the small sample size in our work, it is of interest to continue research in order to obtain more complete data and in comparison with other methods.
Reference47 articles.
1. Baev O. R. Neudachnaya popytka stimulyatsii rodov (podgotovka sheiki matki k rodam i rodovozbuzhdenie): klinicheskie rekomendatsii 2021 / O. R. Baev [i dr.] – M., 2021. – 61 s. Rezhim dostupa: https://mz.mosreg.ru/download/document/10106569. – Baev O. R., Petrukhin V. A., Logutova L. S., Zazerskaya I. E., Solodovnikova N. G., Fatkullin I. F. et al. Unsuccessful attempt to induce labour (preparing the cervix for delivery and labour induction): clinical guidelines. 2021. Moscow; 2021. 61 p. (In Russ.) Available at: https://mz.mosreg.ru/download/document/10106569.
2. Sotiriadis A., Petousis S., Thilaganathan B., Figueras F., Martins W. P., Odibo A. O. et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes after elective induction of labor at 39 weeks in uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 53 (1): 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20140.
3. Souter V., Painter I., Sitcov K., Caughey A. B. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 220 (3): 273. e1–273.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.223.
4. Osterman M., Hamilton B., Martin J. A., Driscoll A. K., Valenzuela C. P. Births: Final Data for 2020. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2021; 70 (17): 1–50. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35157571/.
5. Bhide A., Sedgwick P., Barrett B., Cupples G., Coates R., Goode R. et al. Prostaglandin insert dinoprostone versus trans- cervical balloon catheter for outpatient labour induction: a randomised controlled trial of feasibility (PROBIT-F). Pilot feasibility Stud. 2020;(6):113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00661-7.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献