Experience of dinoprostone vaginal insert using for cervical ripening and induction of labor

Author:

Babich D. A.1ORCID,Baev O. R.2ORCID,Piven V. D.1ORCID,Edilberg I. V.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology

2. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology; Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

3. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Abstract

Introduction. Presently, preinduction and induction of labour is one of the approaches to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes. In this regard, the rate of labour induction is steadily increasing.Aim. To determine the efficacy and safety of dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening and labor induction.Materials and methods. The study included 81 women with a singleton pregnancy of 37 weeks. and more, cephalic presentation of the fetus, with the birth canal not ready and the presence of indications for induction of labor. Dinoprostone vaginal insert was placed for 24 hours or till onset of labor. After removal of the dinoprostone vaginal insert patient was undergoing cervical assessment by digital Bishop Score immediately. If labor didn’t start spontaneously, additional cervical ripening procedures may be considered or labor induction.Result. The Bishop score increased on average by 2 points after cervical ripening with dinoprostone vaginal insert. 77.78% of patients went into labor before dinoprostone vaginal insert removing. 71.6% of the women had the vaginal birth. The cesarean section rate was 29.6%. Failed labor induction was observed in 2.47% cases. All the children were born alive. The average weight of newborns corresponded to the general population. No infectious complications or significant side effects were recorded in the study.Conclusion. The use of dinoprostone vaginal insert is an effective method for cervical ripening (increase in Bishop score by an average of 2 points, p < 0.05) and labor induction (onset of labor before removal of SVT in 78% of cases) with a good safety profile (there were no serious adverse or side effects).

Publisher

Remedium, Ltd.

Reference29 articles.

1. Баев ОР, Петрухин ВА, Логутова ЛС, Зазерская ИЕ, Солодовникова НГ, Фаткуллин ИФ и др. Клинические рекомендации. Неудачная попытка стимуляции родов (подготовка шейки матки к родам и родовозбуждение). М.; 2021. 61 с. Режим доступа: https://sudact.ru/law/klinicheskierekomendatsii-neudachnaia-popytka-stimuliatsii-rodov-podgotovka/.

2. Pergialiotis V, Panagiotopoulos M, Constantinou T, Vokotopoulou LV, Koumenis A, Stavros S et al. Efficacy and safety of oral and sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;308(3):727–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06867-9.

3. Agarwal M, Sinha S, Nitu N, Roy R, Kunwar K, Kumar P et al. Quantitative sonoelastography of the uterine cervix in predicting successful outcome of induction of labour. SAGE Open Med. 2023;(11):20503121231166637. https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121231166637.

4. Freret TS, Woods GT, James KE, Kaimal AJ, Clapp MA. Incidence of and Risk Factors for Failed Induction of Labor Using a Contemporary Definition. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(3):497–504. https://doi.org/10.1097AOG.0000000000004257.

5. Anh ND, Duc TA, Ha NT, Giang DT, Dat DT, Thuong PH et al. Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Induction of Labor in Women with Low-Risk Pregnancies: A Prospective Study. Med Arch. 2022;76(1):39–44. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2022.76.39-44.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3