Indirect taxation on VAT consumption. A possible study of alternative tax rate models in Portugal

Author:

de Moraes e Soares Ricardo1ORCID,Pinheiro Pedro2ORCID,Heliodoro Paula3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ph.D. in Public Administration, Professor, Lisbon Accounting and Business School, Finance Department, Polytechnic Institute of Lisbon

2. Ph.D. in Management, Professor, Lisbon Accounting and Business School, Accounting Department, Polytechnic Institute of Lisbon

3. Ph.D. in Management, Professor, School of Business Administration, Finance Department, Polytechnic Institute of Setubal

Abstract

The adoption of a single VAT rate system in the EU is a complex and controversial issue, since the current model includes several differentiated rates and is intended to reflect sectoral needs and ensure greater fairness in the taxation of consumption. This study aims to analyse which of the general consumption tax models (differentiated rates or a single rate) is more efficient in terms of revenue collection. The study uses official statistics available on the official website of the Tax and Customs Authority for the period 1996–2022. VAT revenue is measured by applying the formula of the EU’s common VAT model with the necessary adaptations to the flat rate model. Quantitative methods are applied to verify which of the tax models is more efficient in terms of collection. For this purpose, two scenarios were defined (17% and 21%). The results suggest that the estimated revenues for the proposed flat rate models are higher than the amounts actually collected through the differentiated rates. They also suggest that the 21% flat rate is preferable to the 17% rate, although the latter has the capacity to maintain current revenue levels and increase the amount collected compared to the current system. The conclusions suggest that the single VAT rate model is technically more preferable and notably more efficient than the current common consumption tax model adopted by the European Union. The study concludes that the refusal to adopt the single-rate model is not due to technical reasons but to political ones.

Publisher

LLC CPC Business Perspectives

Subject

Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Economics and Econometrics,Finance

Reference46 articles.

1. Adhikari, B., & Alm, J. (2017). Evaluating the economic effects of flat tax reforms using synthetic control methods (Working Paper 01/2017). - https://www.wgtn.ac.nz/cpf/publications/working-papers/2017-working-papers/WP_01_2017_Evaluating_the_Economic_Effects_of_Flat_Tax_Reforms.pdf

2. The Effects of the Value-Added Tax on Revenue and Inequality

3. Albino, F. (1999). Imposto Único. In M. Cintra (Ed.), Imposto Único sobre Transações (Prós e Contras) [Single Transaction Tax (Pros and Cons)] (pp. 32-34). São Paulo: Câmara Brasileira do Livro. (In Portuguese). - https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/handle/10438/14278

4. Bahl, R., & Wallace. S. (2007). From income tax to consumption tax? the case of Jamaica. FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis, 63(3), 396-414. - https://www.jstor.org/stable/40913159

5. Baldini, M., & Rizzo, L. (2021). Flat tax: European experiences and Italian proposals. Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, 238(3), 137-162. - https://ideas.repec.org/a/hpe/journl/y2021v238i3p137-162.html

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3