Perceptions and Preferences of Pharmacy Students Towards Classroom Based Versus Online Teaching-Learning and Assessment: A Survey During Covid Pandemic

Author:

Ravikumar Chandini,Roupal Morais Shabna,Nagasubramanian Vanitha RaniORCID

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the perception and the preferences of undergraduate pharmacy students towards traditional classroom-based versus online teaching-learning and assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic. A standardized questionnaire was developed, statistically validated and administered to a total of 531 students pursuing Pharm. D or B. Pharm in the Pharmacy college of a deemed university through mail and WhatsApp as google forms. The completed responses obtained from 454 students were analyzed for their preferences and perceptions towards both methods of teaching-learning and assessments. The significant differences in the responses between students of both programs were assessed using unpaired sample t-test. There were 288 (64%) responses from B. Pharm and 166 (36%) from Pharm. D students. The difference in year of study (i.e. duration of the program), age and number of courses between the two programs were highly significant. Majority of the students stated classroom-based teaching as more advantageous (42.6%). Easy access to the teaching material (51.4%) and lack of personal contact with the teacher (40.2%) were considered as major advantage and disadvantage to online teaching-learning respectively. 54.1% of students opted for online and 46.9% chose traditional classroom teaching for interest generation towards learning. Majority of the students in both programs (43% and 53% respectively) preferred both classroom-based and online teaching-learning to enhance their knowledge, skills and self-directed learning. Similarly, the preferences for assessments were higher for conventional mode of in-person written examinations (71.2%) and remote online assessments (29.8%) through multiple choice questions, assignments etc. Thus students’ perception towards an in depth understanding of the concepts was in favour of traditional classroom based teaching learning, whereas interest towards learning and accessibility to study materials were in favour of online teaching learning. Most of the students preferred learning through blended mode rather than being exposed to either one of the teaching-learning techniques. However, there was a higher preference for conventional in-person mode than the online mode of assessments. Academic dishonesty, technological inconsistency and incompetency were identified as major bottlenecks for remote online assessments.

Publisher

International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3